Shivaji Tulsiram Pachpute VS State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

R. D. DHANUKA, S. G. MEHARE
Shivaji Tulsiram Pachpute – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. V. D. Hon, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. A. V. Hon, Advocate for the Petitioners, for the Appellant; Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, AGP for Respondent No.1, Mr. A. S. Shelke, Advocate for Respondent No.2, Mrs. J. P. Reddy, Advocate for Respondent No.2, Mr. M. P. Gude, Advocate for Respondent No.2

JUDGMENT

R.D. Dhanuka, J. - Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

2. Mr. Yawalkar, learned Addl. G.P. for respondent no.1 in all Writ Petitions waives notice. Mr. Shelke, learned counsel for respondent no.2 in WP/1743/2020 waives notice. Mr. Gude, learned counsel for respondent no.2 in WP/5947/2020 waives notice. Mrs. Reddy, learned counsel for respondent no.2 in WP/7247/2020 and WP/7248/2020 waives notice.

3. Writ Petition No.1743/2020 is filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of Constitution of India inter alia praying for Writ of Certiorari for quashing and setting aside orders/communications dated 30.06.2010, 30.03.2011, 31.05.2013 and 30.06.2014 annexed at Exhibits-F, H, I and J respectively of the Under Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, Agriculture, animal Husbandry, Dairy Development Department and Fisheries Department and Circular dated 17.08.2010 issued by respondent no.2 Mahatma Phule Agriculture University, Rahuri.

4. The petitioners have also prayed for Writ of Mandamus against respondents not to make any recovery from the salary or otherwise the retirement b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

R. D. DHANUKA, S. G. MEHAREShivaji Tulsiram Pachpute – AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

R. D. DHANUKA, S. G. MEHARE
Shivaji Tulsiram Pachpute – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent