SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
Suwalal S/o Dagdulal Kotecha – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and award passed in L.A.R. No. 68 of 1998 by the reference Court/2nd Adhoc Additional District Judge, Ambejogai.
2. The facts giving rise to this the appeal in narrow compass are as under:
2(a) The land admeasuring 71 R from the land survey No.151 situated at village Nandur Ghat, Tq. Kaij, Dist. Beed owned and possessed by the claimants came to be acquired for the purpose of 33 K.V. Substation of M.S.E.B. at Nandur Ghat.
2(b) The notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the L.A.Act'). was published in respect of acquired land on 04.12.1992.
2(c) The respondent/State took over possession of the acquired land on 21.11.1990.
2(d) The Special Land Acquisition Officer was pleased to award the compensation at the rate of Rs.65,780/- to the appellant/claimant. The notice of award under Section 12(2) of the L.A. Act came to be served on the appellant/claimant on 26.01.1997. The appellant /claimant received the compensation under protest and filed the reference before the Speci
Bijender and Ors. Vs. State of Harayana and Anr.
Chimanlal Hargovinddas Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer
Indian Council of Medical Research Vs. T.N. Sanikop and Ors.
Kasturi and others Vs. State of Haryana
M.V.K. Gundarao Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer (L.A.O), Narasaraopet
Mehrawal Khewaji Trust (Registered) Faridkot and others Vs. State of Punjab and others
Subh Ram and others Vs. Harayan State and another
Trishala Jain Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Vithal Rao and Anr. Vs. The Special Land Acquisition Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.