MANISH PITALE
Santosh Kumar Kaddapa More – Appellant
Versus
Gokul Urban Co-op. Society – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manish Pitale, J. - Heard Mr. Ganesh Naik, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr. A.D. Bhobe, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent no. 1-Bank.
2. By the present Revision Application, the Applicant (original Accused), has approached this Court challenging concurrent orders passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Margao, and the Sessions Court, Margao. This is a matter arising out of a complaint filed by the Respondent-Bank under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (said Act, for short). The Magistrate has convicted the Applicant for offence under the said provisions and imposed a sentence upon him to undergo simple imprisonment for two months and to pay compensation of Rs.3,65,000.00 to Respondent-Bank. It is undisputed that the cheque amount was Rs.3,60,910.00.
3. It was the case of the Respondent-Bank, the original Complainant, that the Applicant had approached the said Respondent for a loan of an amount of Rs.6,00,000.00. Since the Applicant was not a member of the Respondent-bank, which is an Urban Co-operative Society, the said fact was also taken into consideration while processing the request of the Applicant for grant of loan.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.