SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. D. DHANUKA, S. M. MODAK
Isha Exim – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prakash Shah i/b Aansh Desai, for the Appellant; P.S. Jetley, Senior Advocate, J.B. Mishra and Maya Mujumdar, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

R.D. Dhanuka, J. - Rule.

2. Mr. P.S. Jetley, learned counsel for Respondents waives service of notice. By consent of parties, Petitions are heard finally.

3. In Writ Petition No. 7898 of 2021, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari for quashing and setting aside the impugned Provisional Release Order dated 22nd October, 2021 and further seeks a writ of mandamus to clear the goods imported by the petitioner covered by Bill of Entry No. 2784973 dated 16th February, 2021 on payment of applicable duty under Chapter 21. In the Writ Petition No. 7355 of 2021, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari for quashing and setting aside the impugned Seizure Memo dated 3rd August, 2021 and the DYCC JNCH, Laboratory Test Reports. The petitioner also seeks a writ of mandamus to forthwith assess and clear the goods imported by the petitioner and covered by Bill of Entry No. 2784973 dated 16th February, 2021 on payment of applicable duty under Chapter 21.

4. By Writ Petition No. 2284 of 2021, the petitioner seeks a declaration that the Officers of the respondent no. 2 in charge of Special Intelligence and Investigation Branch (Import) are not 'proper officers' for the purp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top