SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2259

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, J.
M/S. Blue Vista International Ltd., Rep. by its Director Sujeet Kumar Mawandia, Kolkata - Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Customs, Chennai & Others - Respondent
WP. Nos. 11942, 12474, 12477, 8604, 11260, 11277, 11414, 11662, 12473 & 13314 of 2022 & WMP Nos. 13829, 13832, 10948, 13836, 8518, 10822, 10839, 11130, 11361 & 12584 of 2022
Decided On : 13-06-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:A.K. Jayaraj, N. Viswanathan, Vijay Narayan, Senior Counsel, Jacob, Advocates. For the Respondents: V. Sundareswaran, Senior Panel Counsel.

Prompt exercise of discretion in cases of perishable goods and the allowance of provisional clearance/assessment in cases of classification disputes to prevent congestion at ports and warehouses.

Headnote:

Customs Act - Classification Dispute - Section 110A, Section 125 - Areca Nuts vs. Betel Nut Product - Chapter 8 vs. Chapter 21 - Notification No.20/2015-2020 - Circular No.22/2004-Cus

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, importers of unflavoured Supari from various countries, sought quash of seizure memoranda and release of the goods. The dispute revolved around the classification of the goods under Chapter 8 (Areca Nuts) or Chapter 21 (Betel Nut Product).

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioners to make applications for provisional release under Section 110A, with a prima facie determination of the classification of the commodity within two weeks. The court emphasized the need for prompt exercise of discretion in cases of perishable goods and referred to Circular No.22/2004-Cus.

Issues: Classification dispute between Chapter 8 and Chapter 21, applicability of Notification No.20/2015-2020, exercise of discretion under Section 125, and delay in release of consignments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for prompt exercise of discretion in cases of perishable goods and referred to Circular No.22/2004-Cus, which allows provisional clearance/assessment in cases of classification disputes to prevent congestion at ports and warehouses.

Final Decision: The court directed the petitioners to make applications for provisional release under Section 110A, with a prima facie determination of the classification of the commodity within two weeks.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to Assess and Release the goods viz., 54,000 Mts., viz., 675 Bags of Betel Nut Product known as (Unflavoured Supari) of Indonesia Origin imported from The Republic of Indonesia vide Bill of Entry No.7667115, dated 27.02.2022, totally valued at USD 81,000.00 for 54,000 Mts.)

Common Order:

1. The respondents in all cases are the Customs authorities. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence has filed Miscellaneous Petitions in WMP.Nos.13829, 13832 & 13836 of 2022 seeking to implead themselves as necessary parties. However, after some discussion and in the nature of the order proposed to be passed, I feel that the presence of the DRI in this matter at this juncture is unnecessary. Hence, the petitions for impleadment are not entertained.

2. This batch of writ petitions has been filed by importers, according to them, of unflavoured Supari (Betal Nut Product) ('goods in question'), from various countries. The consignments had all been imported on 27.02.2022. In one batch of writ petitions, that is in WP.Nos.11942, 11260, 11277, 11414, 11662, 13314 of 2022 and WP.No.8604 of 2022, the petitioners have been served with seizure memoranda issued by the 4th respondent intimating the petitioners that the consignments have been seized.

3. In WP.Nos.12473, 12474 & 12477 of 2022, the petitioners would deny receipt of seizure memoranda, but are before the Court insofar as their consignments have also, admittedly, been seized.

4. Some of the petitioners have filed applications for provisional release of the consignments under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short 'Act') on the following dates:

Sl.No. WP.Nos. Company Name Date
1. 11414 of 2022 M/s.Sarveshwari Industries 19.04.2022
2. 11277 of 2022 M/s.Sarveshwari Industries 18.04.2022
3. 13314 of 2022 M/s.Sparsh Trading 09.05.2022
4. 11662 of 2022 M/s.Sarveshwari Industries 19.04.2022
5. 11260 of 2022 M/s.Sarveshwari Industries 18.04.2022
6. 11942 of 2022 M/s.Blue Vista International Limited 19.04.2022
7. 8604 of 2022 M/s.GlowMart Inc. 26.03.2022

5. The prayers of the petitioners are either for quash of the seizure memoranda issued by the 4th respondent and release of the perishable imported consignment of unflavoured supari (Betel Nut Product) or for a mandamus directing the respondents herein to assess and release the goods in question.

6. The Customs Tariff classifies ‘Areca nuts’ under 0802/Chapter-8 Entry 0802 80 as follows:

'0802 80 Areca nuts :
0802 80 10 Whole kg 100% 90%
0802 80 20 Split kg 100% 90%
0802 80 30 Ground kg 100% 90%
0802 80 90 Other kg 100% 90%

The stand of the revenue is that all the consignments imported would fall within the above classification.

7. Per contra, the stand of the petitioners is that their consignments fall under Chapter-21 under the entry 2106 being ‘Food preparations not elsewhere specified or included' reading as follows:

'2106 ....      
2106 10 00 Protein concentrates and textured protein kg. 40% substances    
2106 90 Other    
  Soft drink concentrates:    
2106 90 11 Sharbat kg. 150%
2106 90 19 Other kg. 150%
2106 90 20 Pan masala kg. 150%
2106 90 30 Betel nut product known as “Supari” kg. 150%'

8. In terms of Notification No.20/2015-2020 dated 25.07.2018, the Director General of Foreign Trade has held that all products falling under Chapter-8 are freely importable subject to the condition that the import value is Rs.251/- and above per kilogram CIF. Admittedly, the commodities in all consignments in the present cases, are valued at less than Rs.251/- per kg. Thus, and assuming that the commodities in question were held to fall under the sweep of Chapter 8, they would be categorised as ‘prohibited goods’ as per Notification No.20/2015-202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top