G. A. SANAP
Shri Mukund Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
K. B. Board Mills Llp – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned Advocates for the parties.
2. In this application made under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "the Cr.P.C.") the applicants, who are accused Nos.2, 3 and 4 respectively in a complaint case, have prayed for quashing the Summary Criminal Complaint Case No.1213/2019 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Hinganghat, District Wardha.
3. The facts giving rise to this application are as follows: The applicant Nos.1 to 3 are the accused Nos.2, 3 and 4 respectfully in the Criminal Complaint case (hereinafter referred to as "accused Nos.2, 3 and 4"). The Respondent is the complainant (hereinafter referred to as "complainant"). The complainant filed the complaint under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as "the N.I. Act"). In the said complaint, the accused No.1/ CLC Industries Ltd. is a company. The accused Nos.2 to 7 are the Directors of the said company, in their various capacities. The accused Nos.8 and 9 are the authorized signatories to the cheque in question. It is stated that the complainant supplied on credit paper cones to the
Aneeta Hada vs. Godfather Travels and Tours (P) Ltd
Anil Hada vs. Indian Acrylic Ltd
Ashoke Mal Bafna vs. Upper India Steel Manufacturing and Engineeringcompany Limited
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. Neeta Bhalla
Sheoratan Agarwal vs. State of M.P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.