SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 861

G. A. SANAP
Shri Mukund Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
K. B. Board Mills Llp – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Prafulla S.Khubalkar, Advocate, Arvind Gupta, Advocate, Amit R.Agrawal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned Advocates for the parties.

2. In this application made under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "the Cr.P.C.") the applicants, who are accused Nos.2, 3 and 4 respectively in a complaint case, have prayed for quashing the Summary Criminal Complaint Case No.1213/2019 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Hinganghat, District Wardha.

3. The facts giving rise to this application are as follows: The applicant Nos.1 to 3 are the accused Nos.2, 3 and 4 respectfully in the Criminal Complaint case (hereinafter referred to as "accused Nos.2, 3 and 4"). The Respondent is the complainant (hereinafter referred to as "complainant"). The complainant filed the complaint under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as "the N.I. Act"). In the said complaint, the accused No.1/ CLC Industries Ltd. is a company. The accused Nos.2 to 7 are the Directors of the said company, in their various capacities. The accused Nos.8 and 9 are the authorized signatories to the cheque in question. It is stated that the complainant supplied on credit paper cones to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top