SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 905

G. S. KULKARNI
Surendra Subhedar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Asst. Municipal Commissioner, Mcgm – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
G.S.Godbole, Advocate, Shyam Singh, Advocate, Dharmesh Vyas, Advocate, Smita Tondwalkar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

G.S.KULKARNI, J. - This is an appeal filed by the appellant/plaintiff assailing an order dtd. 23/1/2023 passed by the learned Ad-hoc Judge, City Civil Court at Mumbai whereby a notice of motion (Notice of Motion No.4704 of 2022) filed by the appellant/plaintiff praying for a temporary injunction against the respondent/Municipal Corporation (for short, "MCGM") has been dismissed.

2. The suit in question (L.C. Suit No. 2801 of 2022) came to be filed by the appellant/plaintiff being aggrieved by a notice issued by the respondent (for short "MCGM") under Sec. 3141 of the Mumbai 1 Power to remove without notice anything erected, deposited or hawked in contravention of sec. 312, 313 or 313A Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (for short, "MMC Act"). The prayers in the suit are to the effect the said notice be declared to be null and void and for a permanent injunction to restrain the MCGM from implementing the impugned notice.

3. At the outset, it is required to be stated that in paragraph 3(a) of the plaint the appellant/ plaintiff has claimed to be the owner and occupier of the land described as CTS No.1491 admeasuring 175 sq. mtrs. situated at Mulund (West), Mumbai. In paragraph 1 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top