SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 977

NITIN W. SAMBRE, R. N. LADDHA
Kausar Usman Nadaf – Appellant
Versus
Shahinkayyumnadaf – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vijay Killedar, Advocate, Kuldeep Nikam, Advocate, M.M.Deshmukh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

R.N.LADDHA, J. - Heard learned Counsel, for the parties.

2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable forthwith with the consent of and at the request of the learned Counsel for the parties.

3. By this petition, the Petitioners seek to quash the FIR No.222 of 2017 lodged with Miraj City Police Station, Miraj, District-Sangli, at the instance of Respondent No.1/original Complainant, for the alleged offences punishable under Ss. 498-A, 313 504, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Quashing is sought on the premise that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and that Respondent No.1 has no objection to the quashing of the impugned FIR.

4. Perused the papers. Petitioner No.2 is the husband of Respondent No.1. Petitioners No.1, 3 and 7 are the sisters, Petitioners No. 4 and 5 are the parents, Petitioners No.6 is brother, and Petitioners No.8 and 9 are the relatives of Petitioner No.2. After marriage, Respondent No.1 started residing at her matrimonial home. Since marital discord/differences post-marriage, Respondent No.1 lodged the FIR described above, vide C.R. No. 222 of 2017, at Miraj City Police Station, Miraj, against the Petitioners. Allegations of ill-treatment and demand f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top