SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5896

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Wasim & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
The State & Anr. - Respondents
CRL.M.C. 6525 of 2023
Decided On : 22-09-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State with SI Naveen.

IMPORTANT POINT
Criminal cases with a predominantly civil flavor, particularly those arising from matrimonial relationships, can be quashed if the parties have resolved their entire dispute and the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak.

Headnote:

Quashing of FIR - Matrimonial Dispute - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - [Sections 354/354A/354B IPC, Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005]

Fact of the Case:

The petition was filed seeking quashing of FIR No.94/2021 under Sections 354/354A/354B IPC, registered at PS I.P. Estate, Delhi, based on a settlement between the parties involved in a matrimonial dispute.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the parties had amicably settled their disputes, as evidenced by a Compromise Deed, and that the respondent had returned to her matrimonial home and was living happily with the petitioner. The court concluded that quashing the FIR was in the interest of justice.

Issues: The main issue was whether the FIR should be quashed based on the settlement between the parties and the nature of the offenses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Supreme Court's guidelines in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another and Narinder Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Another, emphasizing that criminal cases with a predominantly civil flavor, such as those arising from matrimonial relationships, can be quashed if the parties have resolved their entire dispute and the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak.

Final Decision: The court quashed FIR No.94/2021 dated 07.04.2021, under Sections 354/354A/354B IPC, registered at PS I.P. Estate, Delhi, along with all proceedings emanating therefrom.

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)

CRL. M.A. 24484/2023 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 6525/2023

3. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.94/2021 dated 07.04.2021, under Sections 354/354A/354B IPC registered at PS I.P. Estate, Delhi including all proceedings arising therefrom, predicated on a settlement arrived at between the parties.

4. Respondent No. 2/Complainant is the wife of Petitioner No. 2 and sister-in-law (bhabhi) of Petitioner No. 1. A matrimonial dispute arose between Respondent No. 2 and Petitioner No. 2 and Respondent No. 2 filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against the Petitioners. With the intervention of friends and well wishers of parties, matter was amicably settled in April, 2021 and Respondent No. 2 has joined the company of Petitioner No. 2, her husband and both are living together happily since April, 2021.

5. Present FIR No. 94/2021 was registered at the instance of Respondent No. 2 against the Petitioners, however, parties have settled all their disputes amicably and a Compromise Deed has been executed on 22.05.2023, recording the terms of compromise, a copy of which has been filed along with the petition. It is recorded in the Deed that Respondent No. 2 has joined the company of Petitioner No. 2 in April, 2021 and is living happily and parties do not want to prosecute the cross FIRs filed against each other. Be it noted that FIR No. 93/2021 has been registered at the instance of Petitioner No. 2 herein against the brothers of Respondent No. 2 and is subject matter of a separate petition being CRL. M.C. 6439/2023, in which the said FIR has been quashed by a separate order passed today. Present petition is restricted to quashing of FIR No. 94/2021.

6. Petitioners and Respondent No.2 are present in Court and have been identified by their respective counsels as well as Investigating Officer SI Naveen PS I.P. Estate.

7. Respondent No. 2 states that since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, she has no objection if the FIR is quashed. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned APP for the State also has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

8. I have heard the learned counsels for the parties and the learned APP. Power of the Court to quash criminal proceedings on the basis of a settlement between the parties has been examined and delineated by the Supreme Court in a number of judgments. Emphasizing that the exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case, the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another, (2012) 10 SCC 303, held that albeit the inherent power is of wide plentitude with no statutory limitation but must be exercised in accord with guidelines engrafted in such power viz.: to secure the ends of justice and to prevent abuse of process of any Court. The Supreme Court cautioned that heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity etc. cannot be fittingly quashed, however, criminal cases having overwhelming and predominantly civil flavor stand on a different footing for the purposes of quashing, particularly, offences arising from commercial, civil disputes or those pertaining to matrimonial relationships etc. where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and parties have resolved their entire dispute. It was held thus:

    "61. .... But the criminal cases having overwhelmingly and predominatingly civil flavour stand on a different footing for the purposes of quashing, particularly the offences arising from commercial, financial, mercantile, civil, partnership or such like transactions or the offences arising out of matrimony relating to dowry, etc. or the family disputes where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and the parties have resolved their entire dispute. In this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top