Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Ahmad Kamal (Dr.) – Appellant
Versus
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility criteria based on merit and ews status. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioners argue wrongful denial of admission. (Para 5) |
| 3. university defends admission process based on merit. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. candidates argue lack of guidance in admissions. (Para 10) |
| 5. court analyzes entitlement for the next academic year. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. court finds no fault of the university in the process. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. petitioners cannot claim admissions based on later vacancies. (Para 16) |
| 8. judgment dismissed. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J. The above-captioned petitions are based on nearly identical facts, raise common grounds of challenge and are accordingly being disposed of by way of a common judgment.
BRIEF FACTS
2. Petitioners - Dr. Ahmad Kamal and Dr. Kiran Gaur [hereinafter "Dr. Kamal" or "Dr. Gaur", respectively] are qualified doctors having a degree in Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine Surgery ["BAMS"]. Desiring to pursue three-year Post-Graduate Ayurvedic Course MD/MS (Ayurveda) for academic year 2020-21, with Institutes under Respondent No. 1 - Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University [hereinafter interchangeably "GGSIPU" or "the University"], they qua
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
