US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Ahmad Kamal (Dr.) – Appellant
Versus
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J. The above-captioned petitions are based on nearly identical facts, raise common grounds of challenge and are accordingly being disposed of by way of a common judgment.
BRIEF FACTS
2. Petitioners - Dr. Ahmad Kamal and Dr. Kiran Gaur [hereinafter "Dr. Kamal" or "Dr. Gaur", respectively] are qualified doctors having a degree in Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine Surgery ["BAMS"]. Desiring to pursue three-year Post-Graduate Ayurvedic Course MD/MS (Ayurveda) for academic year 2020-21, with Institutes under Respondent No. 1 - Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University [hereinafter interchangeably "GGSIPU" or "the University"], they qualified All India AYUSH Post-Graduate Entrance Test 2020 wherein Dr. Kamal secured All India Rank 1579 with percentile of 89.78 and Dr. Gaur secured All India Rank 1358 with percentile of 9
Merit and entitlement for seat allocation in educational institutions depend on adherence to procedural norms, alongside validation of certificates; mere claims of wrongdoing by the institution do no....
The court confirmed that compliance with admission deadlines is essential and a student’s error in submitting documents does not warrant judicial intervention in academic policies.
The university cannot cancel a degree after the completion of the course and must follow a fair procedure in reaching such decisions.
The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling subject mapping criteria for admission through CUET and recognized the discretion available to candidates in choosing subjects closely related to tho....
Eligibility criteria for academic admissions cannot be altered after the admission process has commenced, ensuring fairness in selection.
The court emphasized that the blame for wrongful admission lies more upon the institution than the candidates and that the respondents cannot discriminate between similarly situated students in the s....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article