IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S. B. Shukre, M. W. Chandwani, JJ.
Gravis Holdings Pvt. Ltd & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (L) No. 1510 of 2023
Decided On : 18-01-2023
Permission - Removal of Articles - Court issues directions to Corporation and Mumbai Police for the removal of articles from a structure in question in compliance with the permission granted by the Supreme Court.
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioners were granted permission by the Supreme Court to remove their articles, equipments, and belongings from a structure within a week. However, they faced resistance from unknown persons masquerading as security guards, and the Corporation had not yet started the demolition work.
Finding of the Court:
The Court partly allowed the Petition and directed the Corporation to depute a responsible officer to the site for the removal of articles. The Petitioners were permitted to remove the articles in the presence of the Corporation's authorized representative. Mumbai Police was directed to provide adequate police bandobast and protection to the Petitioners and to register appropriate offences against any person obstructing the removal process.
Issues: Resistance faced by the Petitioners in removing their articles, delay in the demolition work by the Corporation, and the need for police protection during the removal process.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the grievance of the Petitioners, the timeline set by the Supreme Court, and the need to ensure compliance with the permission granted by the Supreme Court.
Final Decision: The Petition was disposed of with the directions issued to the Corporation and Mumbai Police for the removal of articles and the provision of police protection.
JUDGMENT
S. B. Shukre, J. - Heard learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioners, learned counsel for the Corporation and learned AGP for Mumbai Police.
2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith with the consent of the parties and the Petition is taken up for final disposal.
3. This Petition has been filed with the grievance that inspite of permission granted by the Supreme Court vide its order dated 5th January, 2023 passed in Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21642 of 2022, to the Petitioners to remove their articles, equipments and belongings from the structure in question within a week, the Petitioners could not remove their articles from the structure in question and the sole reason for the failure of the Petitioners to do so is the stubborn resistance put up by some bouncers masquerading as security guards deployed by somebody interested in the property whose name is not known to the Petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the Corporation, on instructions received by her from the concerned officer submits that demolition of the structure in question has not yet been started by the Corporation as now the Corporation is in the process of appointing a new contractor for the demolition work and it is likely to take some more time. She further submits on instructions that the officers of the Corporation are not aware of the same any obstructions created by anybody. About the presence of unknown persons within the premises of structure in question, she submits on instructions that the Corporation from its side has never prohibited or restrained the Petitioners from removing their articles in question and on the contrary the Corporation has recommended to the Police that necessary protection be granted to the Petitioners for the purpose of removal of their articles.
5. Mumbai Police represented by Commissioner of Police and his subordinate officers is arrayed as a party Respondents, through various Respondents. Learned AGP appearing for Mumbai Police submits that some time be granted to him, to enable him to take instructions from the officers.
6. However, considering the nature of the grievance of the Petitioners and the timeline set by the Apex Court, it is not possible for this Court to wait for the instructions of the Mumbai Police. Even otherwise, there are hardly any instructions which can be expected to be coming from Mumbai Police in a matter like this as all that Mumbai Police has to do in this case is to provide adequate police bandobast and protection to the Petitioners to remove their articles in terms of the permission granted by the Supreme Court, though same can be done by Mumbai Police by levying permissible charges from the Petitioners.
7. In this view of the matter, we are of the view that the purpose of this Petition can be served by issuing necessary directions to the Corporation and also to Mumbai Police.
8. In view of above, the Petition is partly allowed, Respondent No.1 is directed to depute a responsible officer to the site where structure in question is situated on 28th January, 2023 at 11.30 p.m., who shall be accompanied by the Petitioners or their authorized representatives and, the Petitioners or their authorized representatives shall be permitted to remove the articles etc. in terms of the permission granted by the Supreme Court.
9. We direct the Petitioners to prepare a panchanama and inventory of the articles in the presence of authorized representative of Respondent No.1 which shall be signed by the Petitioners or their authorized representatives and also by the authorized representative of the Corporation. A copy of the panchanama and inventory shall be handed over to the authorized representative of the Corporation.
10. We direct Respondent No.3 to issue necessary orders to his concerned officers for providing adequate police bandobast and protection to the Petitioners on 28th January, 2023 from 11 a.m. and onwards till the time the articles are removed from the structure in question, panchanama is duly prepare
The Court has the authority to issue necessary directions to ensure compliance with permissions granted by higher courts, and to provide protection to individuals in the process of complying with suc....
Police protection for property demolition cannot be granted as a substitute for civil eviction proceedings where a third party is in legal or physical possession of the premises.
Police protection granted for lawful demolition/reconstruction despite pending civil suit, after dismissal of interim injunction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.