SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1049

S. G. MEHARE
Ashok Sadanand – Appellant
Versus
Rojmery Ashok – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Surve Kshitij H., Advocate, Jayabhar Dattatraya, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of parties.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent.

3. The applicant is the husband. He has impugned the order of maintenance passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Ahmednagar in E Petition No. 122 of 2018 dtd. 8/1/2020. The learned Judge quantified the maintenance @ Rs.4, 000.00 per month from the date of filing of the petition i.e. 17/12/2013. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has vehemently argued that the divorce petition was filed prior to the application filed by the respondent before the Magistrate under Sec. 125 of Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequent thereto, she moved an application on 17/12/2013. The competent Court granted the divorce decree in favour of the petitioner on 3/11/2014. The vehement argument has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent suppressed the material fact from the Court and obtained an order of maintenance. Therefore, the order impugned is illegal and against the provisions of law. He would further argue that the learned Judge, Family Court, has passed an order closing the evidence of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top