IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH
VINAY JOSHI, VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.
Abhay S/o. Anup Rathi & Ors. - Applicants
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Khadan, Akola & Ors. - Non-applicants
Criminal Application (APL) Nos. 555, 695 of 2022
Decided On : 08-09-2023
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 188, 285, 34 - Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7 - Petroleum Act, 1934 - Sections 3, 4, 17, 18, 19, 23 - Motor Spirit and High Diesel (Regulation of Supply, Distribution and Prevention of Malpractice) Order 2005 - Quash FIR - Petroleum product is alleged to have illegally sold - Applicants seeking to quash First Information Report – There being no specific allegation that product was stored in any manner contrary to provisions of Petroleum Act, facts stated in complaint do not allege any case made out under provisions of Section 285 of IPC - Para 42.
Finding of the Court: Collector having released vehicles concluding that product, based on first report of chemical analysis was a mixed hydrocarbon oil and not bio-diesel as claimed, instead of desisting from proceeding further in their investigation, prosecution proceeded to file a charge-sheet including therein allegations under Sections 3, 4 and 23 of Petroleum Act - This was done in face of second report wherein an opinion is recorded that sample does not meet specifications/standards for Bio-Diesel and hence rejected - There being no specific allegation that product was stored in any manner contrary to provisions of Petroleum Act, facts stated in complaint do not allege any case made out under provisions of Section 285 of IPC - This is a fit case for interference in inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C – Court hereby quash and set aside FIR.
Result: Applications allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Valmiki Sa Menezes, J.
By these two criminal applications, the applicants seek to invoke this Court’s inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the First Information Report (FIR) No.1203 of 2021 dated 23.12.2021, registered with Khadan Police Station, District Akola and connected Final Report dated 04.10.2022 in RCC No.1242 of 2022.
The Final Report alleges offences against the applicants under Sections 188, 285 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, under Sections 3 and 4 read with Section 23 of the Petroleum Act, 1934 and under the Motor Spirit and High Diesel (Regulation of Supply, Distribution and Prevention of Malpractice) Order 2005 and Amendment Order 2017. The sole applicant in Criminal Application (APL) No.555 of 2022 is alleged to be the owner of the seized product purporting to be bio-diesel or a petroleum product and is alleged to have illegally sold this product, which is subject matter of the seizure conducted pursuant to lodging of the FIR. The three applicants in Criminal Application (APL) No.695 of 2022 are daily wagers and driver of a tanker in which the said product was stored. For the purpose of decision in this matter, we refer to the record in Criminal Application (APL) No.555 of 2022, which is filed at the behest of applicant Abhay Anup Rathi, since the record is common to the other criminal application bearing No.695 of 2022.
2. The facts, as stated in the application and as culled out from the record of the FIR and from the Final Report, that have led to the filing of these two applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, are as under :
(b) The FIR dated 23.12.2021, was registered against the applicants Rohan, Sheikh and Javed at 02:31 hours under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act (hereinafter referred to as “the EC Act”) and under Sections 188, 285 read with 34 of the IPC at the behest of one Nitin Bhimrao Chawhan, the Assistant Police Inspector posted at Local Crime Branch Office, Akola; the allegations in the FIR are that on receiving secret information on 22.12.2021, that the applicant Abhay Rathi was storing bio diesel, a prohibited product, in two tankers, at a Paddy field along the Malkapur - Yevta Road at Akola, the complainant proceeded to the spot with Panchas and other Police personal for conducting a raid and found the said Rohan, Sheikh and Javed unloading the said product from the trucks. That, since these persons nor the applicants were in possession of any licence of sale of bio diesel or petroleum products, he seized the three tankers bearing Nos.MH-30-L-1751, MH-30-L-2087 and MH-46-BM-2331 loaded with this product in the presence of the Panchas. Thereafter, nine samples of the product i.e. three samples each of 750 ml from each truck were drawn, sealed under Panchanama and sent by the complainant for chemical anal
Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Jeewan Kumar Raut and Anr v. Central Bureau of Investigation
State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh
Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Ors. v. R. M. Service Centre and Anr.
Comandant, Gokul Nagar v. Arjun Das
Laxmikant Shankarlal Sarda v. State of Maharashtra and another
The necessity of a government notification for the enforcement of regulations under the Essential Commodities Act and the requirement for searches and seizures to be conducted by authorized officers ....
An Inspector must possess specific qualifications and proper notification as outlined in law to lawfully conduct search and seizure; failure to comply renders such actions illegal.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt in NDPS Act cases, and non-compliance with statutory provisions vitiates the trial.
Prosecution under IPC and FSSA for tobacco products is unsustainable; mandatory provisions of NDPS Act must be followed to maintain charges.
Non-compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act, requiring samples to be drawn and certified by a Magistrate, vitiates the trial as it fails to produce primary evidence.
A search conducted without the proper legal authority by a police officer invalidates any resulting conviction under the Essential Commodities Act, rendering proceedings unsustainable.
Mandatory compliance with documentation and procedures in drug cases under the N. D. P. S. Act is essential for a valid prosecution; failure results in acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.