IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G. S. Kulkarni, Jitendra Jain, JJ.
Globolive 3D Private Limited - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Department of Revenue Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi and anrs.– Respondents
Writ Petition No. 39 of 2023
Decided On : 24-08-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226 and 227 - Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 2(6), (17), 13, (12) - Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 54 (3), 70 - Export of services - Refund of tax - Petitioner praying for setting aside an order passed by appellate authority by which respondent’s/department’s appeal, against granting of petitioner’s refund application has been allowed, consequence being, declining of refund of tax paid by petitioner – Merely because petitioner has secured data from different source so as to create services to be supplied to Emirates, it would not amount to petitioner falling within definition of Section 2(17) - Para 26.
Finding of the Court: There was no material whatsoever before appellate authority to come to a conclusion that in present case, place of supply of such database access or retrieval services, was not location of recipient of services which in present case was a supply to Emirates Defence Industries Co. PJSC outside Indian taxable territory - None of conditions as provided for in exception to section 13(12) were satisfied for appellate authority to come to a conclusion that person receiving such services was deemed to be located within taxable territory as none of two contradictory conditions as set out in exception, were satisfied – Court observe that purport and intent of agreement in question has been totally misconstrued by appellate authority - Meager reasons as set out in impugned order were certainly not sufficient for Appellate Authority to reach to a conclusion that services in question was not export of service so as to deny petitioner’s referred claim - Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of certiorari / mandamus or any other appropriate Writ / order/ direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India calling for records pertaining to Petitioner case and after going into validity and legality thereof to quash and set aside impugned order.
Result: Petition succeed.
JUDGMENT :
G.S. Kulkarni, J.
1. Rule, made returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, heard finally.
2. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India whereby in the absence of an appellate tribunal being constituted, the petitioner is before the Court praying for setting aside an order dated 31 March, 2021 passed by the appellate authority, being an order passed by the Joint Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise Appeal-I, Mumbai, by which the respondent’s/department’s appeal, against granting of the petitioner’s refund application has been allowed, consequence being, declining of the refund of the tax paid by the petitioner.
3. The question which falls for determination is as to whether the services rendered by the petitioner of providing Satellite derived 3D model services, would fall within the purview of “export of services” as defined under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act or would be categorized as Online Information Database Access or Retrieval services as defined under Section 2(17) of the IGST Act, in the context of Section 13 of the IGST Act.
4. The relevant facts as averred in the petition are:-
The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner entered into a Service Agreement dated 09 September, 2019 with M/s. Emirates Defence Industries Co. PJSC, which was inter-alia in regard to providing of service of production of 3D city models of three cities being Abudhabi, AL Ain, AL Dhafra as per the specifications provided by M/s. Emirates Defence Industries Co. PJSC. The relevant clauses of the service agreement entered between M/s. Emirates Defence Industries Co. PJSC and the petitioner are as under:-
The Scope of services performed by Consultant shall include the following:-
Supply of Satellite derived 3D City model of Abu Dhabi Emirate with following specifications.
Using photogrammetric workstations, our team automatically or semi-automatically converts Aerial flight and Satellite stereo imagery into groups of polygons accurately configured and presented as 3D city models. Using stereo paris of these images, relevant roof points are measured and coded. The walls result by intersecting the roof polygons with the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) and back projecting to the roof. This ensures the new 3D data is consistent with the existing 2D data. Quality management and editing is then prior exporting to a host of software file formats including Collada, Geodatabase, Multipatch shapefile, .dxf. .kml, .fbx. .skp .fbx, & obj.”
2. Delivery Schedule and Deliverables
The total period for completion of services is 90 days from commencement date which is distributed as follows:
| S.No. | Deliverables | Part | Delivery | Delivery Method |
| 1. | Abu Dhabi City | 1 | 30th September, 2019 | Encrypted hard drive or through FTP |
| 2. | Abu Dhabi City | 2 | 31st October, 2019 |
|
| AI AIN City | 1 | 31st October, 2019 |
| |
| 3. | AI AIN City | 2 | 28th November, 2019 |
|
| AI Dhafra | Final | 28th November, 2019 |
|
Fees and Expense
| S.No. | Item Description | KM2 | Rate (USD) | Amount (USD) |
| 1. | Satellite Imagery derived 3D Model of Abu Dhabi City with 1-2 Metre accuracy in accordance with consultant proposal dated 29th | 3000 | 219.666 | 659,000 |
| Net Total Amount (USD) Six Hundred Fifty Nine Thousand only | 659,000 | |||
Any additional fees not covered under this Agreement shall require a prior written approval of EDIC.
B.1 Payment Schedule
The total fees will be paid according to the following schedule:-
| S. No. | Deliverables | Part | Delivery Date | Payment Due | Due Amoun |
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's services did not qualify as 'Intermediary Services' and that the place of supply of services was not in India as per the rele....
The court emphasized that for services to qualify as 'export of services', authorities must accurately ascertain the petitioner's role as an intermediary, citing inadequate findings in previous rulin....
Clinical research services on foreign client-supplied goods, performed in India but reports delivered abroad, qualify as export of service; Rule 4 of POPS Rules inapplicable as goods are altered, not....
The services provided were not intermediary services but on a principal-to-principal basis, justifying the refund of unutilized input tax credit as the denial was arbitrary and without jurisdiction.
The main legal point established is that the definition of 'intermediary' under the IGST Act does not include a person who provides services on his own account, and the determination of the place of ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the characterization of services as intermediary services under the IGST Act requires a careful analysis of the nature of the services provide....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.