M. S. SONAK, M. S. KARNIK
Ketaki Gokhale – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa – Respondent
ORDER :
M.S. Karnik, J.
1. The present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred by the Petitioner-mother seeking production and restoration of permanent custody of the minor child aged about 4 years in her favour in terms of Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, wherein it is specified that ordinarily the mother should have the custody of the minor child, who is below the age of five years. It is the case of the Petitioner that her minor son is presently separated from her and that his best interest, lies in the care and custody of the mother. The Petitioner alleges that Respondent No.2 i.e. father of the minor child, has detained him in violation and contravention to the laws of India.
2. A custody Petition is pending trial before the Superior Court of California, County of Sonoma. The parties are presently within the jurisdiction of this Court. The Petitioner prays that in the interim, the custody be restored to her in accordance with laws in India and following the precedents laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and those of this Court.
3. The Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are citizens of United States of America and
Dhanwanti Joshi v. Madhav Unde [(1998) 1 SCC 112]
Elizabeth Dinshaw v. Arvand M. Dinshaw [(1987) 1 SCC 42 : 1987 SCC (Cri) 13]
J v. C [1970 AC 668 : (1969) 2 WLR 540 : (1969) 1 All ER 788 (HL)]
Rajiv Bhatia vs. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.
Tejaswini Gaud & Ors. vs. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.