SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1439

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AURANGABAD BENCH
MANGESH S. PATIL, S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.
Sameer Kiran @ Raghoba Bhopi – Petitioner
Versus
The Joint Charity Commissioner, Aurangabad – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 13850, 14312 of 2019
Decided On : 27-02-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: R.N. Dhorde, V.R. Dhorde, Amol Gandhi.
For the Respondents: V.J. Dixit, L.V. Sangit, S.B. Yawalkar.

Headnote:

Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 – P.T. Act – Section 22 – Recommending re-appointment – Held, Without resorting to some enquiry that by following principles of natural justice of extending an opportunity of being heard to persons who were members of first board of trustees who had completed the tenure of 5 years without there being any proceeding against them under section 41(1) of the P.T. Act, has accepted conclusions in report as it is regarding their misconduct – It is trite that a person cannot be condemned unheard – If serious allegations were basis to deprive petitioners an opportunity of continuation as members of board of trustees, learned Joint Charity Commissioner ought to have given an opportunity to them to meet these lopsided allegations levelled by four ex-officio trustees who themselves have had no opportunity to undertake any enquiry or investigation and had never resorted to any – Court allow writ petitions partly.

ORDER :

1. Heard both sides.

2. Though the petitions have been filed by two individuals separately, they are impugning the selfsame order passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner - respondent no. 1, Aurangabad in Miscellaneous Application no. 1003 of 2019 dated 16-10-2019 in the matter of Shree Renuka Devi Sansthan, Mahur (hereinafter referred to as “the Trust”) Taluka - Mahur, District - Nanded, PTR no. A-2185 (Nanded) which is registered as a public trust under the provisions of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the “P.T. Act”) thereby accepting the report submitted by the four ex-officio trustees out of 11 trustees, recommending re-appointment of four trustees and replacing the present petitioners and one more viz. Bhavanidas Renukadas Bhopi by some other individuals who are the respondent Nos. 14 to 16 in writ petition no. 13850 of 2019 and respondent nos. 9 to 11 in writ petition no. 14312 of 2019.

3. Though there is a checkered history and long standing litigation, it would suffice for the present to refer to few of the facts as are necessary for decision on these writ petitions. A scheme for the trust was finalized by the Joint Charity Commissioner by his order dated 14-07-2014 and appointed first board of trustees comprising of 11 members for the first term of 5 years which came to an end on 14-07-2019. The first board of trustees was as under:

(1)

Principal District Judge, District Court, Nanded

Ex-Officio Chairman/President of the Trust

(2)

Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kinwat

Ex-Officio Vice Chairman/Vice President

(3)

Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kinwat

Ex-Officio Secretary of the Trust

(4)

Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Mahur

Ex-Officio Treasurer of the Trust

(5)

Bhavanidas Renukadas Bhopi

Member

(6)

Vinayak Narayan Fandade

Member

(7)

Chandrakant Baburao Bhopi

Member

(8)

Sameer S/o Kiran @ Raghoba Bhopi

Member

(9)

Shripad Bhargavram Bhopi

Member

(10)

Sanjay Rambhau Kannav

Member

(11)

Ashish Gunwantrao Joshi

Member

Clause 13 of the scheme approved by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner provides that except the ex-officio trustees the tenure of the rest of the members of the first board of trustees would be 5 years. After the tenure of the members from serial no. 5 to 11 coming to an end, the ex-officio members of the board from serial no. 1 to 4 would submit a report to the Joint Charity Commissioner regarding appointment of new members and based on that the Joint Charity Commissioner would appoint the members or permit continuation of the old members.

4. Pursuant to clause 13 of the scheme, the first four ex-officio trustees submitted a report to the Joint Charity Commissioner, Aurangabad dated 30-08-2019 which was registered as Miscellaneous Application no. 1003 of 2019. The ex-officio members in their report gave reasons for continuation of some of the members from the first board of trustees and also reasons for deleting the present two petitioners and few other individuals as well as replacing them by new members names of who were also suggested.

5. Based on such report, by the impugned order, the learned Joint Charity Commissioner accepted it and granted approval to whatever was suggested by the ex-officio members while constituting the new board of trustees.

6. We have extensively heard the learned Senior Advocate Mr. Dhorde, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Dixit, Mr. Gandhi and the learned AGP Mr. Yawalkar and perused the papers.

7. At the outset, it is necessary to note that admittedly, though the learned Joint Charity Commissioner has finalized a scheme for the trust under section 50A, the scheme is still at an amorphous stage inasmuch as, it is under challenge which is presently pending before this Court. Admittedly, operation of the scheme has not been stayed. We are not sure when that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top