VIBHA KANKANWADI, ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Satish Bansi Lagad – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order of conviction passed by learned Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar dated 12-06-2017 in Sessions Case No.148 of 2015 by which present appellants are held guilty for offence under Sections 302 and 324 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and thereby sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and simple imprisonment for six months for each of the offences respectively.
Story of Prosecution unfolded is as under :
2. Deceased Dattatraya was working as Ward Boy in Bagirathi Hospital, Ahmednagar whereas his parents stayed at Aathawad, Taluka and District Ahmednagar and his married sisters stayed at Ahmednagar. He used to visit his parents on holidays. Accused were their neighbours. There was love affair between daughter of accused no.2 and deceased Dattatraya. In a marriage of one of the brothers of accused no.1 namely Santosh, Deceased Dattatraya had declared his intention to perform marriage with Sangita. Accused were upset since then and two months prior to the incident in question, they had visited house of informant i.e. father of deceased Dattatraya and had issued threats to kill Dattatraya if he per
Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirjibhai v. State of Gujarat 1983 Cri LJ 1096 : (AIR 1983 SC 753)
Bhagwan Jagannath Markad v. State of Maharashtra; (2016) 10 SCC 537
Ravasaheb @ Ravasahebgouda and Others v. State of Karnataka; (2023) 5 SCC 391
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on trustworthy and reliable direct eye witness accounts, supported by medical evidence, to establish the guilt of the accused.
Conviction for homicide upheld based on credible eyewitness testimony; acquitted parties lacked sufficient evidence of participation in crime.
Conviction under Sections 302 and 326 of IPC requires credible ocular evidence, with emphasis on eyewitness credibility, especially from injured parties, establishing guilt despite differing roles am....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 34 of the IPC to hold all accused persons responsible for the assault and subsequent death of the deceased.
The court upheld the conviction under IPC Sections 326 and 324, emphasizing the credibility of injured witnesses and the sufficiency of evidence despite the absence of independent corroboration.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of credible eyewitness and injured witness accounts, the application of Section 149 IPC for vicarious liability, and the relevance....
Direct eyewitness testimony, if credible, suffices for conviction regardless of motive, as established in this case involving murder under Section 302 of the IPC.
The court held that the appellant's act of killing the deceased by slashing his neck with a knife fell squarely under Section 300 of the IPC and not under Section 304. This is because Section 300 dea....
Conviction for murder under Section 302 established through credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, despite minor inconsistencies and investigation delays.
The reliability of an injured eye-witness testimony and its corroboration by medical evidence are crucial in establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.