Back
MILIND N. JADHAV
Emerson Climate Technologies (India) Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Shirish Ramchandra Pawar – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
1. Heard. Rule. Taken up for final hearing by consent of the parties.
2. By the present Writ Petition filed under the provisions of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India Petition has challenged the Award dated 01.03.2019 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court at Satara in Reference (IDA) No.53 of 2016. Petitioner is a private limited company. Dispute before the Labour Court, Satara pertains to reference made by the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Satara for adjudication of the termination by order dated 10.04.2013 of Respondent - workman who was employed in the services of the Petitioner – Company. Present Writ Petition challenges the Award partly since the Award holds that the enquiry conducted against the second party is fair, legal and proper, but the findings drawn by the Enquiry Officer are perverse.
3. Such of the relevant facts which are necessary for deciding the present Writ Petition are as under:-
3.1. Petitioner – Company has its registered office at Pune. One of its plant / factory is situated at Atit, District Satara. Petitioner is engaged in the manufacturing of hermetically sealed compressors at Atit. Petitioner – Company employe
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the findings of the Enquiry Officer must be logical and not perverse, and the departmental enquiry must be conducted in a fair and proper mann....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the evidence adduced by the management was sufficient to prove the misconduct against the workman, and the Workman's past record of repeated c....
Disciplinary actions by employers must comply with fair enquiry standards; failure to allow cross-examination does not nullify properly conducted proceedings.
Departmental proceedings and criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts and charge in a departmental case against appellant and charge before criminal court are one and same.
Rejection of an approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 deems that the order of discharge or dismissal had never been passed, entitling the employee to reinst....
The court emphasized the importance of proper evidence and the need for checking cash by the checking staff to establish misconduct. The court also highlighted the limited role of the court under Art....
The court upheld the principle that the Labour Court has the authority to re-appraise the evidence and come to its own conclusion about the guilt or otherwise of the workman. The court also emphasize....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the findings of a disciplinary enquiry must be based on reliable evidence, and the charges against an employee must be sustained by evidence t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
