IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ.
Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR) – Appellant
Versus
The Municipal Commissioner – Respondent
Public Interest Litigation No. 24 of 2022
Decided on : 29-01-2024
Public Interest Litigation - Hospital Completion - Constitution of India, Article 226, Article 243-W, Twelfth Schedule - The court discussed the non-completion of a hospital project and the responsibilities of the Municipal Corporation under Article 243-W and Twelfth Schedule. It highlighted the duty of the Corporation to provide public health services and the delay in completing the hospital project. The court also emphasized the need for affordable public health services for the disadvantaged and economically weaker sections of the society.
Fact of the Case:
The PIL sought the completion of a hospital in Kausa-Mumbra locality and an inquiry into the alleged excess expenditure by the Corporation. The court appointed a Commission to inspect the hospital and report on its status.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the hospital had not become operational despite completion, and existing healthcare facilities were not part of the 100-bedded hospital. It also noted the need for affordable public health services for the disadvantaged population in the area.
Issues: Non-completion of the hospital project, delay in providing public health services, alleged irregularities in construction, and the proposed PPP model for running the hospital.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the duty of the Corporation to provide affordable public health services and the need to comply with its own resolution to provide free medical services to the poor. It also highlighted the interplay between fundamental rights and directive principles, emphasizing the duty of the State to improve public health.
Final Decision: The court directed the Corporation to run the hospital ensuring compliance with its resolution to provide free medical services to the poor. It permitted the Petitioners to make a representation to the State Government regarding alleged irregularities in the construction process.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned Counsel representing the parties and perused the records available before us on this Public Interest Litigation Petition (PIL Petition).
2. This PIL Petition seeks interference of this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to issue appropriate directions to the Respondents to ensure completion of a hospital in Kausa- Mumbra locality falling within the municipal limits of the Municipal Corporation of Thane (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation). A prayer has also been made to issue a direction to institute an inquiry into the causes of delay in completing the said hospital project and further into the alleged excess expenditure incurred by the Corporation in the said project and to take requisite action against the Officers responsible for such excess expenditure, which according to the Petitioners, appears to have been incurred without the sanction of law.
3. Having regard to the causes sought to be espoused in this PIL Petition, we shall, first take up the issue surrounding non-completion of the hospital project and the steps which are required to be taken by the Respondents to make it functional so as to cater the public health care needs of the population living in the Kausa-Mumbra locality.
4. A study conducted by the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (hereinafter referred to as the TISS) in the year 2014 into the health conditions of the citizen living in Kausa- Mumbra highlights the urban paradox wherein on one hand, it has areas that reflect economic prosperity while, on the other, it has areas that are characterized by sub-standard housing and non-availability of amenities to serve basic human needs which is detrimental to the well-being of the inhabitants. The study further highlights that urban slum residents of the area exhibit poorer health characteristics which indicates presence of structural conditions that shape inequalities in health and illness affecting the poorer, especially the vulnerable sections of the society such as infants, young children, elderly and women.
5. The study also reveals that the four pillars of health, which include promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative services delivered by Health Personnel and their support structures are weak in Kausa-Mumbra. The study concludes as under:
6. With the insertion of Part IX-A in the Constitution of India w.e.f. 1st June 1993, the Municipalities or the Urban Local Governance bodies in the country have acquired a constitutional status. Part IX-A not only strengthens the municipalities by raising them to a constitutional status but it also bestows certain responsibilities upon them. Article 243-W mandates the Legislature of a State to vest in the Municipalities, by making law, certain powers, authority and responsibilities which include performance of functions and implementation of schemes as may be entrusted to the Municipalities including those in relation to the matters listed in Twelfth Schedule. One of the functions enlisted in Twelfth Schedule is “Public Health, sanitization conservancy and solid waste management”. Thus, it becomes a constitutional function and duty of every Municipality to implement the schemes entrusted to it including the schemes in relation to the public health as well.
7. It appears that realizing the statutory and constitutional functions entrusted to the Corporation, a decis
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala [(1973) 4 SCC 225 : 1973 Supp SCR 1]
Mohd. Hanif Quareshi v. State of Bihar [1959 SCR 995 : AIR 1958 SC 956]
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India [(1980) 3 SCC 625 : AIR 1980 SC 1789]
State of Karnataka v. Ranganatha Reddy [(1977) 4 SCC 471]
State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan [1951 SCC 351 : 1951 SCR 525 : AIR 1951 SC 226]
State of Punjab and Ors. Vs. Mohinder Singh Chawla and Ors.
State of Punjab and Ors. Vs. Ram Lubhaya Bagga and Ors.
Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association Vs. Union of India
Union of India Vs. Moolchand Kharati Ram Trust
Unnikrishnan Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
U.P. State Electricity v. Hari Shankar Jain [(1978) 4 SCC 16 : 1979 SCC (L&S) 481 : AIR 1979 SC 65]
The duty of the State to improve public health and the interplay between fundamental rights and directive principles in ensuring affordable public health services.
The judgment emphasized the discretion of the State and its agencies to use their powers in the public interest and for public good, ensuring equitable treatment and non-discriminatory methods in gra....
Point of law : private hospitals require to abide by its provisions, particularly, Section 39 read with Rule 19 of the Kerala Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Rules, 2018 (herein....
State hospitals must provide timely medical treatment; failure constitutes a breach of the right to life under Article 21.
Military hospitals providing free services to armed forces personnel are not covered under the Consumer Protection Act, thus complaints against them for negligence cannot be maintained.
Proper medical aid and adequate health care be provided at the Health Centres and hospitals irrespective of financial constraints to CKD patients and proper records of the treatment given, should be ....
The Kerala Clinical Establishments Act, 2018 is constitutional and serves public health goals, despite challenges regarding definitions and authority powers; due process safeguards were upheld.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.