Back
DEVI PRASAD SINGH, S.C.CHAURASIA
DEVENDRA PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Hon’ble Devi Prasad Singh, J.—In these bunch of writ petitions, common questions of fact and law are involved, hence with the consent of the parties, writ petitions are decided by the present common judgment.
FACTS
2. Petitioners possess BAMS, BHMS and BUMS degrees and the degree with regard to pharmacist from recognized colleges and entitled to practice and discharge their obligations in accordance to statutory provisions. They were appointed under the scheme framed by the Government of India implemented by State of U.P., namely National Rural Health Mission (2005-2012) (in short NRHM) by the State authorities. The scheme commenced in the year 2005 and sheduled to continue upto 2012. The NRHM scheme is wholly financed by Government of India as additional grant to improve health and hygienic condition of the State of U.P. The Government of India is continuing with the original scheme and provided sufficient fund but the State authorities took a decision to discontinue the service of Male Ayush doctors and pharmacists. Being aggrieved with the decision of the Government, the petitioners have preferred the present bunch of writ petitions.
3. The undisputed facts on record are th
Point of Law : A mere direction of Supreme Court without laying down any principle of law is not a precedent - It is only where Supreme Court lays down a principle of law that it will amount to a pre....
The central legal principle established in the judgment is the obligation of the State Government to ensure the payment of salaries to the petitioners for the period they had worked, as per the provi....
The court upheld the constitutionality of gender-based reservation in nursing courses, establishing that such discrimination is permissible under Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution, aimed at empo....
The Central Government retains jurisdiction to clarify promotion criteria and integrate service personnel post-reorganization, and the lack of personal hearings does not violate established principle....
The denial of S.A.C.P. benefits to doctors under the Employees State Insurance Scheme violated Article 14 of the Constitution, as they perform the same duties as their counterparts in the Provincial ....
The classification of AYUSH doctors and doctors under Central Health Service in different categories is discriminatory and unreasonable since doctors under both segments are performing the same funct....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
