VIBHA KANKANWADI, S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Atharva Anil Kshirsagar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, matter is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission.
2. The petitioner approaches this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with following prayers:
(C) Be please held and declare that, the provisions of MAFSU academic regulations 2016, Rule No. 19(19) examination and evaluation, Rule No. 22(4) Promotion and Rule No. 26(6)(2) of Unfair means are unconstitutional and causing injustice with students and therefore required to be quash and direct the respondent university to modify those provisions and for that purpose issue necessary orders.
(D) Issue writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus, thereby direct the respondent No. 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.