RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
2. In the first Writ Petition No. 13128/2023, the Petitioner Cooperative Sugar Factory has put forth prayer clauses B, C, D and E as under:
(C) The respondent no. 2 and 3 may kindly be directed to publish election program from the stage of nomination for the election of managing committee of petitioner Karkhana, immediately.
(D) Pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition the orders dated 03.10.2023 issued by respondent no. 2 state Co-operative Election Authority M.S. Pune may kindly be stayed.
(E) Pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition the respondent no. 2 and 3 may kindly be directed to publish election program from the stage of nomination for the election of managing committee of petitioner Karkhana, immediately.”
3. In the second Writ Petition No. 13141/2023, the Petitioners have put forth prayer clauses B, C, D, and E as under:
Deorao Vithoba Kale vs. Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nagpur and Others
Jai Mahavir Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Panchal Keshavlal Narbheram and Others
Mohanrao Anandrao Munde and Another vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Ramchandra Ganpat Shinde and Another vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.