RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Bapurao Gopala Gaikwad – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.
2. By the present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses (B), (C) and (D) as under:
(C) Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus, directing the respondent No. 5 Tahsildar, Shrigonda to decide the representation/application dated 15.02.2022 filed by the petitioner in respect of correction of 10R area from Gat No. 56 situated at village Chimbhale, Tq. Shrigonda, Dist. Ahmednagar from acquisition proceeding and for that purpose issue necessary orders.
(D) Pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition, grant stay to the operation, execution and/or implementation of impugned notice dated 12.01.2024 issued by the respondent No. 7 Grampanchayat and for that purpose issue necessary orders.”
3. The learned Counsel for t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.