IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
Chetan Hariraji Purohit – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Bail Application No. 3234 of 2022
Decided On : 28-02-2024
NDPS Act - Bail Application - Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 29 - Summary of Acts and Sections
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought bail in connection with an FIR registered for possession of commercial quantity of Ganja. The police intercepted a car and found the contraband concealed within it. The applicant was allegedly involved in trafficking the contraband from Odisha to Pune.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant was not entitled to bail due to the conscious possession of the contraband and the likelihood of committing similar offenses if released.
Issues: Non-compliance of mandatory provisions, conscious possession of contraband, likelihood of committing similar offenses if released
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the seriousness of drug offenses and the need to strictly adhere to the provisions of the NDPS Act. It considered the conscious possession of the contraband and the likelihood of the applicant committing similar offenses if released as grounds for denying bail.
Final Decision: The application for bail was rejected by the court.
JUDGMENT :
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
1. By this application, the applicant who is one of the three accused has prayed for his release on bail in connection with an FIR registered with Chakan Police Station, Pune vide C.R. No. 49 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short “NDPS Act”) for allegedly found in possession of commercial quantity of Ganja during a chance raid on 10.01.2022 at about 15.30 hours.
2. Briefly stated, it is the case of the prosecution that under the leadership of Police Inspector Satish Pawar, the police personnel were on usual patrolling duty in a Government Vehicle No. MH-14JM-6261 along with other few private vehicles. While patrolling within the territorial jurisdiction of Alandi Police Station, when the team headed by P.I. Satish Pawar entered into the jurisdiction of Chakan Police Station on Chakan-Shikrapur Road, a White Coloured Hundai i-20 car bearing Registration No. RJ-14-ZC-3310 overtook the police vehicle in a high speed. The team suspected some foul play and, therefore, followed the said Hundai i-20 car. Ultimately, the said car was intercepted wherein three passengers were found, comprising two males and one female. Admittedly, the co-accused namely Kantilal Mangilal Ghanchi and Monika Hakim Sinh have already been granted bail.
3. The Police Officer from the raiding team introduced themselves by displaying their identity cards. Upon inquiry with the passengers in the Hundai i-20 car, it revealed that the applicant though is a temporary resident of Pune basically hails from Village Karlu, Tahasil Binmal, Dist. Jalor, Rajasthan. Second accused-Kantilal Ghanchi is also a permanent resident of Tahasil Marwad Junction, Dist. Pali, Rajasthan and third accused-Monika Sinh is a resident of Hardev Nagar, Barrah Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh. The raiding team apprised them about their right to be searched in the presence of Gazetted Officer, both in Hindi and Marathi language. They were also apprised of the search and seizure of Hundai i-20 Car, which was being driven by accused Kantilal Ghanchi. All of them declined to get themselves searched in the presence of any Gazetted Officer or Magistrate in view of Section 50(1) of the NDPS Act.
4. Accordingly, the raiding team in the presence of two pancha witnesses searched Hundai i-20 car and found following contraband, which was of commercial quantity:
2. 29 kg 674 gram ganja found concealed in 39 packets stored in the dickey of the said car.
3. 17 kg 899 gram ganja found concealed in 9 packets stored in the dickey of the said car.
4. 18 kg 199 gram ganja concealed in 9 packets.
5. 12 kg 344 gram ganja concealed in dickey.
5. Thus, 98 kg 843 grams of ganja worth Rs. 31,73,075/- was found in the dickey of the said car. Seizure panchanama depicts that the contraband which came to be seized from the said Hundai i-20 car comprised flowering and fruiting tops of the cannabis plant along with seeds accompanied with greenish brownish coloured substance, meaning thereby, the said substance indeed falls within the definition of “Ganja” as provided in Section 2(iii)(b) of the NDPS Act. The seized commercial quantity indeed is in the form of flowering of fruiting tops of the cannabis plant. As per the definition of “Ganja” if the flowering of fruiting tops are without seeds and leaves when not accompanied by the tops, then it would be termed as “Ganja.” If seeds and leaves are found which are not accompanied by the tops, it would exclude from the definition of “Ganja.” The Investigating Agency has, thereafter, drawn different samples of 25 grams each from the bags. The Hundai i-20 car No. RJ-14-ZC-3310 was seized. The seized samples were duly sealed in different packets in the presence o
Durand Didier vs. Chief Secretary, Union Territory of Goa
Hira Singh and Another vs. Union of India and Another
State of Punjab vs. Baldev Singh
State NCT of Delhi vs. Malvindar Singh
State of Himachal Pradeh vs. Sunil Kumar
Union of India through Narcotics Control Bureau, Lucknow vs. Md. Nawaz Khan
The seriousness of drug offenses and the need to strictly adhere to the provisions of the NDPS Act, considering conscious possession of contraband and the likelihood of the applicant committing simil....
The court emphasized the limitations on granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the definition of ganja under Section 2(iii)(b) of the NDPS Act, and the applicability of Section 50 of the NDP....
The relevance of antecedents in bail applications and the applicability of Section 43 in cases of contraband recovery in transit.
Point of law: That there has been a judicious application of mind by the judge who is deciding an application under Section 439 of the CrPC must emerge from the quality of the reasoning which is embo....
The court upheld the conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act for possession of ganja, clarifying the applicability of Sections 42 and 43, and addressing the burden of proof regarding po....
The court emphasized strict compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act, highlighting that significant lapses can undermine the prosecution's case, especially in light of prolonged incar....
Point of Law : Liberal approach in the matter of bail under the NDPS Act, is uncalled for. Therefore, it is quite clear that an order of bail cannot be granted in an arbitrary or fanciful manner.
Point of law: whether there was compliance of the procedure laid down under Section 42 of the NDPS Act or not, could be ascertained at the time of trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.