SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 421

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A. S. Chandurkar, Jitendra Jain, JJ.
Anoushka Tusharkumar Desai - Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra, Through the Government Pleaders’ and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (L) No.20458 of 2022
Decided On : 08-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Anita Castelino a/w. Ms. Namrata Agashe, Ms. Sudha Dwivedi Ms. Vinsha Acharya, Mr. Ranjit Agaste, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. P. H. Kantharia, G.P. a/w. Mr. Abhay L. Patki, Addl.G.P., Mr. Gaurav Sharma i/b. Mr. Ashutosh Kulkarni, Advocate, Mr. Swaraj Jadhav, Advocate

Headnote:

Eligibility Criteria - LLB Admission - Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Education Institutions (Regulations of Admissions and Fees) Act, 2015, Information Brochure of State CET, Circular No.Eig/C/1652 of 2014 - The court found that the petitioner was eligible for admission to the 5-year LLB course based on the percentage of marks obtained in the International Baccalaureate (I.B.) course, as per the eligibility criteria specified in the Information Brochure of State CET and Circular No.Eig/C/1652 of 2014. The court also noted the lack of requirement for considering grade points from the I.B. course and the inconsistency between the AIU equivalence policy and the Information Brochure, and ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the issuance of Permanent Registration Number (PRN) and quashing the communications declaring the petitioner as ineligible.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to challenge communications from the University declaring her ineligible for enrolling in the 5-year LLB course, based on the score points from her International Baccalaureate (I.B.) course.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner was eligible for admission to the 5-year LLB course based on the percentage of marks obtained in the I.B. course, as per the eligibility criteria specified in the Information Brochure of State CET and Circular No.Eig/C/1652 of 2014.

Issues: The main issue was the eligibility of the petitioner for the 5-year LLB course based on the I.B. course score points and the interpretation of the eligibility criteria specified in the Information Brochure of State CET and Circular No.Eig/C/1652 of 2014.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's eligibility should be determined based on the percentage of marks obtained in the I.B. course, as per the eligibility criteria specified in the Information Brochure of State CET and Circular No.Eig/C/1652 of 2014, and ruled in favor of the petitioner.

Final Decision: The court directed the issuance of Permanent Registration Number (PRN) to the petitioner, regularization of her admission to the 5-year LLB degree course, and quashed the communications declaring her as ineligible, allowing the writ petition in favor of the petitioner.

JUDGMENT :

Jitendra Jain, J.

1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner seeks to challenge the communications dated 3rd December 2021 and dated 4th April 2022 of Respondent No.2-University, whereby the Petitioner has been declared as ineligible for enrolling and completing her 5 year LLB course.

2. Narrative of the events:-

(i) The Petitioner is a resident of Mumbai and aspires to pursue a law career.

(ii) On 5th July 2020, the Petitioner cleared her International Baccalaureate (I.B.), which is equivalent to 10+2 course. The Petitioner appeared in 6 subjects and obtained average 60% marks, which is equivalent to 22 points as per I.B. standard.

(iii) The Petitioner aspiring to pursue a law career applied for State Common Entrance Test of Respondent No.1-State for 5 year degree course in law beginning from academic year 2020-21. The Information Brochure issued by Respondent No.1-State CET Cell provided in paragraph 7.2 eligibility criteria for LLB-5 years course. The eligibility criteria was classified based on the State to which the candidate belongs. Part-A provided for Maharashtra State Candidature Candidates, Part-B provided for All India Candidature Candidates, Part-C provided for Jammu and Kashmir migrant candidature candidate and Part-D provided for children of NRI/OCI/PIO/CIWGC/Foreign National Students. The Petitioner applied for eligibility criteria as per Part-A being applicable for Maharashtra State Candidature Candidates.

(iv) On 8th October 2020, Respondent No.1 issued a notification under Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Education Institutions (Regulations of Admissions and Fees) Act, 2015, for providing eligibility conditions and requirements for admission to various courses. Serial No.6 of the said notification provided eligibility conditions and requirements for admission to undergraduate course in law. The said eligibility conditions and requirements are pari-materia to what was stated in the Information Brochure referred to above.

(v) On 11th October 2020, Respondent No.1 conducted CET for LLB 5 year course and declared results of the said test on 27th November 2020. The Petitioner scored 77 out of 150 marks in CET. The score card issued by the Respondent No.1 stated that the score is valid for admission to LLB 5 year course for the academic year 2020-21, subject to fulfilling the eligibility criteria mentioned in Information Brochure published and displayed on the website, the said Information Brochure has been referred by us herein-above.

(vi) Based on Centralised Admission Process (CAP), the Petitioner was allotted admission in Respondent No.4-College. In the application form, the Petitioner gave all the information including educational details, wherein she mentioned that she has scored 59.83% from I.B. board in Science Stream. It is important to note that the table wherein details were to be filed does not have any column to specify the points as per I.B. course but what was required to be filled was only the percentage which the Petitioner filled as 59.83%.

(vii) On 31st March 2021, the Respondent No.1 issued a provisional allotment letter allotting seat to the Petitioner to take admission in Respondent No.4-College. The said allotment letter states that provisional admission is given based on documents uploaded by the Petitioner and subject to scrutiny and validation with original documents by the admitting college. The Petitioner was allotted a seat in the ‘Minority’ category. The said provisional allotment letter also contains instructions to be followed by the Principal of the admitting law college.

(viii) On 15th July 2021, Respondent No.4 forwarded the enrolment form along with supporting document of all the students for admission to law degree course for academic year 2020-2021 to Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

(ix) On 12th August 2021, Respondent No.1 informed Respondent No.4 about admission of 120 students to 5 year LLB course in Respondent No.4-College. The copy of

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top