IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Vaibhavi D.Nanavati, J.
Madhusudan Gunvantray Pandya - Appellant
Vs.
Saurashtra University - Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 17479 of 2021
Decided On : 21-06-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article, 226 – Chapter-II of the Bar Council of India Legal Education Rules, 2008 – Rule-7 – Power of high court to issue certain writs – Letters Patent Appeal – Petitioner by way of present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has prayed for reliefs – Held, Court otherwise cannot sit in an Appeal to a decision taken by an expert body, and therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere under Article- 226 of Constitution of India – Rule only suggests that a candidate must possess 45% marks for securing admission in law course/ L.L.B. course – University Ordinance No. 154 as referred above prevails over Rules of Bar Council of India and when petitioner had passed B.Com. Examination with 'exemption' i.e. in 'pass class' and on 2nd attempts, he is not eligible for admission in L.L.B. course – Court is not inclined to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article-226 of Constitution of India, by directing respondents to consider educational qualification of petitioner as required under Bar Council of India Legal Education Rules, 2008 for admission to LLB course when petitioner has passed B.Com examination with 'pass class – Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
(1.) The petitioner by way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has prayed for the following reliefs:
(b) Issue Notice for final disposal.
(c) To allow this petition by issuing writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order directed by directing respondents that the petitioner is possessing the educational qualification as required under Bar Council of India Legal Education Rules, 2008 for admission LLB Course and is petitioner is qualified to pursue the 3 year LLB Course for which he has already got admission at Navyug College, Virpar.
(c/1) To hold and declare and direct that the petitioner is possessing the educational qualification as required by Bar Council of India Legal Education Rules, 2008 and on that basis petitioner is eligible for 3 years course of Bachelors of Law and further direct respondent No. 1 to 3 to admit petitioner in 3 years L.L.B Course;
(d) Pending hearing a final disposal of the present petition, this Hon'ble Court may grant interim relief by directing respondent no. 1 and 2 to immediately reconsider the case of petitioner in view of Bar Council of India Legal Education Rules, 2008 and permit petitioner to attend classes.
(e) To grant costs of this petition to the petitioner and to grant any other appropriate and just relief/s."
2. The brief facts as stated by the petitioner are stated thus:
2.2. The petitioner intending to pursue 3 years Bachelor of Law (L.L.B.) course, had submitted an application dated 03.09.2020 before the respondent University seeking admission. The petitioner had paid fees for both the semesters and had appeared for internal examination conducted by the respondent no.3 - college. The respondent no.3 - college after period of some months, rejected the application of the petitioner stating that the petitioner had given 2 try in B.Com and after final examination of semester of semester refunded the fees paid by the petitioner. The petitioner addressed a letter to the respondent University on 25.06.2021 intimating them about the aforesaid facts. The university replied to the said communication dated 25.06.2021 of the petitioner, by letter dated 03.07.2021 stating that since the petitioner has given 2 try in 3rd year B.Com and was declared pass with 'Exemption'. Therefore, the percentage cannot be counted and as per the Rules of Bar Counsel of India, student of Open/General category are required to secure 45%, O.B.C. category 42% and S.T. category 40% minimum to secure admission and since the petitioner belonging to Open/General category has so called not secured 45% is ineligible to secure admission. It was further informed that the admission process is under provision of Bar Council of India and University.
2.3. The petitioner wrote a letter to the Chairman/Secretary, Bar Council of Gujarat intimating them about the aforesaid facts by letter dated 22.07.2021 and further requested to do the needful, if found eligible for course of 3 years L.L.B. The respondent No.4 - Bar Council of Gujarat by communication dated 04.08.2021 stated that the petitioner has secured 45.57% and considering the result of examination of March, 2007 and March, 2008, and therefore, as per Rule-7 of Bar Council of India Education Rules, 2008, and therefore, as per Rule-7, the petitioner is eligible for getting admission in course of Bachelo
An ITI course can be considered equivalent to the Pre-University qualification required for admission to a three-year LL.B. program as per Bar Council regulations.
Eligibility for law course requires strict adherence to educational qualifications as set by the Bar Council of India, ruling out non-equivalent preparatory courses.
Court upheld that ITI course can be considered equivalent to 12th standard for admission to law programs, challenging restrictive admissions criteria of the University.
The eligibility criterion of 50% marks for LL.B. entrance is arbitrary and violates Articles 14 and 21, infringing on the right to education as part of personal liberty.
Eligibility for admission to three-year LL.B. course includes I.T.I qualifications, challenging prior restrictions based on past interpretations of educational norms.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.