IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M.S. Karnik, J.
Harishkumar K. B. - Appellant
Versus
State of Goa - Respondent
Criminal Application (Bail) No. 371 of 2023 (F)
Decided On : 12-06-2023
BAIL - PRE-ARREST BAIL - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant despite serious allegations of rape and other offenses, citing the unexplained delay in filing the FIR, the applicant's cooperation with the investigation, and the filing of the chargesheet. The court emphasized that custodial interrogation was not necessary and imposed stringent conditions to mitigate concerns about witness tampering and threats.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecutrix, a maid servant, alleged that the applicant, known to her, offered her a lift in his car and subsequently raped her. There was a delay of almost one month in lodging the FIR, and the applicant had previously filed a complaint against the prosecutrix's employer, indicating a possible motive for false allegations.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted the delay in filing the FIR, the applicant's cooperation with the investigation, and the completion of the investigation with a chargesheet filed. It concluded that custodial interrogation was unnecessary and granted anticipatory bail with conditions.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail despite serious allegations and concerns about witness tampering.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the delay in filing the FIR, the applicant's cooperation with the investigation, and the absence of criminal antecedents warranted the granting of anticipatory bail, provided stringent conditions were imposed to protect the integrity of the investigation.
Final Decision: The application for pre-arrest bail was allowed, subject to specific conditions aimed at ensuring the applicant's compliance and the safety of the prosecution witnesses.
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.
2. This is an application for pre-arrest bail for offences punishable under Ss. 363, 376, 506 (ii), 354 D and 354 of the Indian Penal Code, registered by the Verna Police Station.
3. The prosecutrix alleged that she was working as a maid servant in the household of one Mr. 'S'. The applicant is a resident of a neighbouring society. The applicant is known to her. The FIR was registered on 27/3/2023. The prosecutrix alleged that one month prior to the registration of the FIR, the applicant who was driving his car, came along side her and asked her to sit in his car by offering a lift. Since it was dark, the applicant accepted the offer and sat in his car. Instead of dropping the prosecutrix home, the applicant went to a nearby hillock and raped her. Thereafter, he dropped her home. On the next day, there was an attempt on his part to again commit rape on her person but she pushed him and ran from the place.
4. There is an unexplained delay of almost one month in lodging the FIR. It is pertinent to note that the prosecutrix was working as a maid servant with one Mr. 'S', who was on inimical terms with the present applicant. On record is the complaint filed by the applicant dtd. 17/9/2022 against Mr. S. and others about threats which the applicant received from Mr. S. and the other persons named in the complaint.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Shri Nagvenkar, however, while opposing the application for bail, submitted that the offence alleged against the applicant is serious in nature and there is every possibility that the applicant might threaten the witnesses and tamper with the evidence. It is not in dispute that the applicant has joined the investigation and cooperated with the investigation. In para 11 of the Say filed by the Investigating Officer, it has been recorded that the investigation into the present crime is completed and the chargesheet is filed on 27/4/2023 vide chargesheet no. 23 of 2023.
6. Considering the delay in registering the FIR, the fact that the applicant has cooperated with the investigation and that the chargesheet has already been filed, in my opinion, the applicant can be granted anticipatory bail as the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not necessary. Undoubtedly, the allegations are serious but the delay in registering of the FIR and upon considering the materials on record, now that the chargesheet has been filed, the applicant can be released on anticipatory bail having regard to the over all circumstances. The apprehension of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor about the applicant tampering with the evidence and threatening the prosecution witnesses can be allayed by imposing stringent conditions. There are no criminal antecedents recorded against the applicant. Hence, the application for pre-arrest bail of the applicant is allowed on the following conditions :
ORDER
(i) In the event of his arrest, in connection with CR No. 31/2023 of the Verna Police Station, the applicant be released on bail upon furnishing PR bond in the sum of Rs.15, 000.00 with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
(ii) The applicant shall regularly attend the trial Court on the dates fixed.
(iii) The applicant shall not enter the area of Kira Paula area, Kesarval, Cortalim, South Goa, where the victim is residing and working until further orders of the trial Court.
(iv) The applicant shall not threaten the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence.
(v) Liberty to the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail in the event the applicant fails to abide by any of the conditions imposed.
(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Goa without the prior permission of the trial Court.
(vii) The applicant shall furnish his contact details to the trial Court as well as the Investigating Officer and inform of change, if any.
(viii) Apart from the above conditions, the applicant shall report to th
Anticipatory bail can be granted even in serious offenses if there are mitigating factors such as delay in FIR registration and cooperation with the investigation, provided that appropriate condition....
The court considered the nature and gravity of the offence alleged and the explanation for the delay in filing the FIR in deciding the application for pre-arrest bail.
Pre-arrest bail is a privilege, not a right, and must be granted only in exceptional circumstances, considering the gravity of accusations.
Anticipatory bail can be granted when allegations against the applicant are not directly linked to the commission of serious offences, provided conditions are imposed to ensure cooperation with the i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of various factors and parameters for granting anticipatory bail, including the nature and gravity of the accusation, the anteced....
Anticipatory bail is not a right and should only be granted in exceptional circumstances, particularly in serious allegations where custodial interrogation is necessary to protect the investigation.
The court denied anticipatory bail based on the nature of the accusations, the explanation for the delay in lodging the FIR, and the applicant's lack of cooperation with the investigation.
The unexplained delay in lodging the FIR can be a strong ground for granting anticipatory bail in cases involving offences against women.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.