SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1728

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
Mohd. Ishaq Raj Mohammad – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Fatima S. Kazi, Advocate, S.S. Kazi, Advocate, B.V. Virdhe, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The appellants - claimants, feeling aggrieved by the judgment and award dtd. 19/8/2000 in Land Acquisition Reference No. 61 of 1990 passed by the learned Senior Division, Aurangabad (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Reference Court") have preferred this appeal for enhancement of compensation. It is signifcant to note that, the learned Reference Court has dismissed the Land Acquisition Reference of the present appellants - claimants and justifed the quantum of compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Ofcer under the award dtd. 24/1/1990.

2. The backgrounds facts of the case are as follows:

    The land gut No. 227 to the extent of 55 Are situated at village Diggar, Tq. Kannd owned by the appellants was acquired for Palashi Medium Project by the concerned Land Acquisition Ofcer. Notifcation under Sec. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act to that effect was published in Government Gazette on 6/3/1986 and it was also published in daily newspaper "Nawamaratha" on 29/2/1986. The village publication was made on 25/1/1987. Thereafter, the Land Acquisition Ofcer passed an award on 24/1/1990 and categorized the land of appellants in Group - V as the assessment was abo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top