Back
REVATI MOHITE DERE, GAURI GODSE
Sangita Vilas Kiwade – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
GAURI GODSE, J. - This is an appeal preferred by the accused challenging the Judgment and Order dtd. 1/3/2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 137/2011 by which the appellant is convicted and sentenced as under:
ii) for the offence punishable under Sec. 307 of the IPC, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.250.00, in default to pay the fine amount, suffer imprisonment for one month.
iii) for the offence punishable under Sec. 363 of the IPC, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.250.00, in default to pay the fine amount, suffer imprisonment for one month.
iv) for the offence punishable under Sec. 32-B(b) of Bombay Money Lender's Act, to pay a fine of Rs.250.00, in default to pay the fine amount, suffer imprisonment for one month. All the aforesaid sentences are directed to run concurrently.
2. According to the prosecution, the incident
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on consistent testimonies to establish guilt under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The conviction under Section 307 IPC was overturned due to unreliable child witness testimonies and the failure of the prosecution to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
The reliability of a child witness's evidence, the need for corroboration, and the significance of medical evidence in establishing guilt in a murder case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on witness testimonies and medical evidence to establish guilt in a murder case, and the requirement of evidence for kidnapping or abd....
The credibility of a child witness and the need for corroboration in the absence of independent evidence.
The conviction for murder was upheld based on consistent testimonies of child witnesses and corroborative medical evidence, establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The testimony of a child witness can be relied upon if corroborated by other evidence, and the presence of support persons does not imply tutoring.
The court established that the reliability of child witnesses must be carefully evaluated, and a conviction cannot be sustained on their testimony alone without corroborative evidence, especially whe....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
