ROHIT B. DEO, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Kartiki – Appellant
Versus
Nagpur Improvement Trust – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
Y.G.KHOBRAGADE, J. - Heard.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, heard finally at the stage of admission by consent of the parties.
3. The challenge in the present petition is to the order/communication dtd. 30/9/2022 issued by respondent 2- Building Engineer (West), Nagpur Improvement Trust (for short, 'NIT'), whereby the respondents did not accord sanction to the residential house construction plan because of the operation of prohibitory order in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) 40/2013 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
4. The facts of the present case lie in narrow compass. One Mr. Dashrath Balaji Kalambe had purchased the plot in question under Sale Deed dtd. 19/7/1991 from Paradise Co-operative Housing Society, Nagpur and subsequently the petitioners purchased the said plot No. 45, admeasuring 2000 sq. feets bearing Khasara Nos. 14, 16, 17/1, 18/1, 19/1.k, 19/2/d, 20/1?k, 20/1p and 20/1N, P. H. No. 44 of Mouza- Sonegaon, City Survey No. 11 and Sheet No. 300 situated near Lake, Sahakar Nagar, Sonegaon, Nagpur bearing Corporation House No. 3869/45 and Ward No. 75 within the limits of Nagpur Improvement Trust, Nagpur/NMRDA and Nagpur Municipal Corporation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.