SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1712

ROHIT B. DEO, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Kartiki – Appellant
Versus
Nagpur Improvement Trust – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.R. Agrawal, Advocate, G.A. Kunte, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

Y.G.KHOBRAGADE, J. - Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, heard finally at the stage of admission by consent of the parties.

3. The challenge in the present petition is to the order/communication dtd. 30/9/2022 issued by respondent 2- Building Engineer (West), Nagpur Improvement Trust (for short, 'NIT'), whereby the respondents did not accord sanction to the residential house construction plan because of the operation of prohibitory order in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) 40/2013 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

4. The facts of the present case lie in narrow compass. One Mr. Dashrath Balaji Kalambe had purchased the plot in question under Sale Deed dtd. 19/7/1991 from Paradise Co-operative Housing Society, Nagpur and subsequently the petitioners purchased the said plot No. 45, admeasuring 2000 sq. feets bearing Khasara Nos. 14, 16, 17/1, 18/1, 19/1.k, 19/2/d, 20/1?k, 20/1p and 20/1N, P. H. No. 44 of Mouza- Sonegaon, City Survey No. 11 and Sheet No. 300 situated near Lake, Sahakar Nagar, Sonegaon, Nagpur bearing Corporation House No. 3869/45 and Ward No. 75 within the limits of Nagpur Improvement Trust, Nagpur/NMRDA and Nagpur Municipal Corporation.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top