IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
S.V. Gangapurwala, R.N. Laddha, JJ.
Shivaji Vidyapeeth Sevak Sangh - Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 792 of 2019
Decided On : 31-01-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the government resolutions and proposed changes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. submission of staffing proposals and their implications. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. contentions presented by various advocates on behalf of the petitioners. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. arguments regarding changes in nomenclature and responsibilities. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. concerns regarding the idealization of recovery processes. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. counterpoints regarding the legality of resolutions and their repercussions. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. question of fraud and potential miscommunication in processes. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. summary and conclusions drawn from the presented evidence. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 9. notable fraud in proposals impacting funding and positions. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 10. findings of the special squad regarding procedural failures. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 11. assessment of legal responsibilities and the mandatory need of protocol. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 12. rulings concerning recovery claims and legal doctrines. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 13. final orders regarding the government resolutions and subsequent actions. (Para 60 , 61) |
| 14. order to extend interim protections before full recovery. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ACTING CJ., J. - Government Resolution dtd. 17/12/2018 is issued by the Higher and Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai directing the constitution of a Committee comprising of Deputy Director, Accounts and Audit Services, Assistant Director, Auditor and two other Officers to investigate and report to the State Government with regard to ;
<WXY>(i) the post whose nomenclature has been changed with consequent change in pay scales, should be brought back to the pay scale as per Notification dtd. 7/10/2009;
(ii) the excess amount paid to such employees whose pay scales have been changed due to change in the nomenclature, be recovered;
(iii) refixation of pension of such employees who have retired after getting the benefit of the Government Resolution dated 24th February 20211;
(iv) excess payment to such employees be recovered from the arrears payable to the retired employees as per the 7th Pay Commission</WXY>
2. Under the said Government Resolution dtd. 17/12/2018 the State Government cancelled Government Resolutions dtd. 2/11/2010, 18/2/2011, 3/11/2012, 7/2/2011, 24/2/2011, 26/10/2010, 22/11/2011 and 15/2/2012 issued by the Higher and Technical Department, Mumbai.
3. In Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No.5919 of 2019, the Petitioner therein seeks implementation of Government Resolution dtd. 17/12/2018 under supervision of this Court and the Government Authorities. It further seeks directions against the State to conduct inquiry as per the circumstances under which the Government Resolutions have been issued with consent of the Cabinet and approval of the Finance Department. It further seeks directions to redetermine the pay scales which have been revised by the impugned Government Resolution and further seeks recovery of the amount paid in excess by the State Government. It further seeks direction to implement the 7th Pay Scale on the basis of the original pay scale that was sanctioned in the meeting held in Mantralaya on 16/4/2009 and original nomenclature sanctioned by each University.
4. Various Writ Petitions are filed to assail the Government Resolution dtd. 17/12/2018. As all these Writ Petitions are based on common set of facts and involve common question of law, to avoid rigmarole, are decided by common judgment. The PIL also being based on same facts is being decided along with these Writ Petitions. The Writ Petitions were filed at the principal seat and the benches at Aurangabad and Nagpur. By an administrative order of the Hon'ble The Chief Justice, the same are clubbed together.
5. It appears that Government Resolution dtd. 6/7/2009 was issued for fixing staffing patter







Chandi Prasad Uniyal and Ors. vs. State of Uttarakhand
Chandrakant Sakharam Karkhanis and Ors. vs. State of Maharasthra
The court emphasized the principle of equal pay for equal work, ruling that the petitioners were entitled to the same pay scale as their counterparts in other universities due to administrative error....
Points Of Law : Any amounts paid to appellants under order of the Principal dated or even under the order of learned Single Judge (if any) will not be sought to be recovered from appellants.
The recovery of excess payment made to pensioners after retirement would be impermissible if it would be iniquitous, harsh, or arbitrary. Additionally, a circular issued by an officer of the State mo....
Point of Law - Supreme Court has directed that the recovery from the employees belonging to the Class-III and IV service is “impermissible in law” and also if the same is effected after a period of f....
The court established that primary teachers in municipal schools are entitled to the same higher pay-scale as those in district schools, emphasizing equality in pay for equal work.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.