Back
M. S. SONAK, B. P. DESHPANDE
Sandeep Dattaram Salgaonkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of multiple petitions in response to intertwined firs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. overview of claims and incidents leading to the complaints. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. contrasting views on the validity of complaints and charges. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court's reluctance to involve cbi based on incident severity. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. clarification of protocols for fir quashing. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. assessment of external circumstances leading to complaint's filing. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. discrepancies in evidentiary claims impacting case credibility. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. legal representation rights and their implications. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 9. arguments on improbabilities and burden of misconduct proof. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 10. affirmation of abuse of process as grounds for legal relief. (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 11. final rulings on petitions concerning fir validity. (Para 54 , 55) |
| 12. conclusive disposition of legal challenges and petitions. (Para 68 , 69) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
BHARAT P.DESHPANDE,J. - Criminal Writ Petition Nos.64 of 2021 and 65 of 2021 are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself with Cri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
