Back
MANISH PITALE
Ambrosia Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sunita Dileep Nevatia – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. By this application, the Applicant (Defendant No. 2) is seeking judgment for dismissal of the suit on the basis of admissions. This application has been filed in peculiar facts and circumstances. In order to understand the background in which the present application has been filed, it would be appropriate to briefly refer to the facts of the present case.
2. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit under Sec. 6 of the Specific Relief Act (hereinafter refer to as the aforesaid Act) for restoration of possession of suit premises, which according to the Plaintiff, was forcibly and illegally taken from the Plaintiff by the Defendants. The Plaintiff has also sought ancillary reliefs, including interim reliefs, which were also separately pressed on the basis of Notice of Motion filed in the suit.
3. In the plaint, the Plaintiff has referred to and relied upon a Leave and License Agreement dtd. 7/10/2017, whereby the Plaintiff was inducted as a licensee from 21/3/2018 to 20/3/2023, it being referred to as the license period. The Plaintiff was inducted as licensee for running a restaurant and bar in the suit premises. It is the case of the Plaintiff that it spent about Rs.2.
The court established that the expiration of a license does not negate the right to seek restoration of possession under Sec. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, and illegal dispossession cannot be condone....
The court ruled that a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act requires proof of dispossession within six months, and the limitation period begins from the date of dispossession, not from the....
In Section 6 Specific Relief Act suit, plaintiff must prove settled possession on exact dispossession date against specific defence of third-party prior occupation; trial court's perverse ignorance o....
The court reaffirmed that in suits under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, the focus is solely on possession and unlawful dispossession, not on the title of the property.
Possession and temporary injunction claims under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, providing summary protection against unlawful dispossession, established by continuous occupation even in absenc....
A suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act requires clear and unequivocal admissions, particularly regarding forcible dispossession, for a decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. Disputed issues an....
Section 6 Specific Relief Act suits are summary for possession restoration only; composite suits with injunction, compensation, or title/payment disputes between developer and purchaser exceed scope ....
The court affirmed that a Civil Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate a suit for eviction of a trespasser, and a decree can be granted based on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
