IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J.
Jitendra v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Criminal Appeal No. 1272 of 2016 (Indore): against the judgment 24.8.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Badwah, District Khargone in Sessions Trial No. 13/2015;
Decided on 31.3.2022
(1) Age -- school admission register -- parents admitted in cross-examination that they are not aware of date of birth of prosecutrix
-- father admitted that on basis of his assumption, he mentioned prosecutrix’s age and got her admitted in school -- such scholar register entry, although admissible in evidence u/s. 35 of Evidence Act, cannot be best piece of evidence. (2010) 8 SCC 714 followed. [Para 13
(2) Age -- third molars are wisdom teeth -- erupt between 17th to 25th year -- only 28 teeth of prosecutrix found erupted -- third molars not erupted -- proved that prosecutrix was below 17 years at time of incident. Modi's Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology (23rd Edition) relied on. [Para 16
(3) Penal Code, 1860 -- Ss. 363, 366, 376 (2) (i) and 375 Sixthly (as amended on 3.2.2013) -- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 -- S. 3/4 -- age of prosecutrix -- third molars are wisdom teeth -- erupt between 17th to 25th year -- only 28 teeth erupted -- third molars not erupted -- proved that prosecutrix was below 17 years at time of incident -- incident took place on 11.11.2014 -- provisions of Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 enforced -- in view of amended clause Sixthly of S. 375 of IPC, prosecutrix being below 18 years, was not competent to give consent -- prosecution could not prove beyond reasonable doubt that prosecutrix was below 16 years of age at time of incident -- conviction u/s. 376 (2) (i) of IPC not sustainable -- converted into S. 376 (1) of IPC -- findings with regard to rest of offences affirmed. Modi's Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology (23rd Edition) relied on. [Paras 14 to 18
¼1½ vk;q && fo|ky; izos'k jftLVj && ekrk&firk us izfrijh{kk esa Lohdkj fd;k fd mUgsa vfHk;ksD=h ds tUe dk fnukad Kkr ugha && firk us Lohdkj fd;k fd viuh /kkj.kk ds vk/kkj ij mlus vfHk;ksD=h dh vk;q dk mYys[k fd;k vkSj fo|ky; esa mldk izos'k djk;k && ,slh fo|kFkhZ jftLVj izfof"V] ;|fi lk{; vfèkfu;e dh /kkjk 35 ds v/khu lk{; esa xzká gS] loZJs"B lk{; ugha gks ldrhA ¼2010½8 ,l lh lh 714 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 13
¼2½ vk;q && rhljh nkढ+sa vDy nkढ+sa gksrh gSa && 17osa ls 25osa o"kZ ds e/; mxrh gSa && vfHk;ksD=h ds ek= 28 nk¡r mxs gq, ik, x, && rhljh nkढ+sa ugha mxha && lkfcr fd ?kVuk ds le; vfHk;ksD=h 17 o"kZ ls de FkhA eksnh Ñr esfMdy T;wfjLizwMsUl ,aM VkWfDldksykWth ¼23ok¡ laLdj.k½ voyafcrA¼iSjk 16
¼3½ naM lafgrk] 1860 && /kkjk 363] 366] 376¼2½ ¼1½ rFkk 875 NBok¡ ¼3-2-2013 ;Fkk la'kksf/kr½ && ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e] 2012 && /kkjk 3@4 && vfHk;ksD=h dh vk;q && rhljh nkढ+sa vDyh nkढ+sa gksrh gSa && 17osa ls 25osa o"kZ ds e/; mxrh gSa && ek= 28 nk¡r mxs gq, && rhljh nkढ+sa ugha mxha && lkfcr fd ?kVuk ds le; vfHk;ksD=h 17 o"kZ ls de dh Fkh && ?kVuk 11-11-2014 dks ?kVh && naM fof/k ¼la'kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e] 2013 ds mica/k izo`Ùk && naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 375 ds la'kksf/kr NBosa [kaM dh n`f"V ls] vfHk;ksD=h 18 o"kZ ls de gksus ds dkj.k] lEefr nsus ds fy, l{ke ugha Fkh && vfHk;kstui{k ;qfDr;qDr lansg ds ijs lkfcr ugha dj ldrk fd ?kVuk ds le; vfHk;ksD=h 16 o"kZ ls de vk;q dh Fkh && naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 376 ¼2½ ¼1½ ds v/khu nks"kflf) fLFkj j[ks tkus ;ksX; ugha && naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 376 ¼1½ esa laifjofrZr & 'ks"k vijk/kksa ls lacaf/kr fu"d"kZ vfHkiq"VA eksnh Ñr esfMdy T;wfjLizwMsUl ,aM VkWfDldksykWth ¼23ok¡ laLdj.k½ voyafcrA ¼iSjk 14 ls 18
JUDGEMENT
1. The appellant has preferred this appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) [in short “Cr.P.C.”] against the judgement dated 24.8.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Badwah, District Khargone (M.P.) in S.T. No.13/2015, whereby the appellant has been convicted under sections 363, 366 and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code (in short “IPC”) alongwith section 3/4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short “POCSO Act”) and sentenced him to undergo RI for 2 years with fine of Rs.1,000/-, RI for 3 years with fine of Rs.1,000/-, RI for 10 years with fine of Rs.2,000/- and RI for 7 years with fine of Rs.2,000/ and in default of payment of fine, to undergo additional RI for 1 month, 1 month, 2 months and 2 months respectively.
2. Prosecution story, in brief is as follows :-
(i) On 11.11.2014, at about 16.00 hours, when complainant’s minor daughter prosecutrix, aged about 14 years was alone in her house situated at Indira Nagar Bedi, Sanawad, District Khargone, appellant came there and on the false pretext of marriage took her to Moondi, District Khandwa, then to his sister’s house at Masangaon and thereafter to Salkanpur on his motorcycle. He kept her there captivated in a dharamshala for four days and committed rape upon her repeatedly. On the same day, when the complainant returned back home, he found the prosecutrix as well as the appellant missing. He searched for them at the nearby places as well as relatives of the appellant and on the next day i.e. on 12.11.2014, at about 18.30 hours, lodged the report against the appellant on the basis of which FIR (Exhibit-P/5) was registered against him at Police Station Sanawad, Khargone for the offences punishable under sections 363 and 366 of IPC. On the next day i.e. on 13.11.2014 at about 8.10 PM, Investigating Officer S. I. Jitendra Yadav went to the spot and prepared spot map (Exhibit-P/6).
(ii) On 18.11.2014, appellant took the prosecutrix to District Court, Khandwa saying that he will marry her in the Court, where prosecutrix’s uncle Deepak and his friend Ganesh saw them. They informed police station Khandwa, who brought prosecutrix as well as appellant to Police Station Sanawad, where on the same day at about 18.30 hours, prosecutrix was recovered, as per Dastyadi Panchanama (Exhibit-P/1). S.I. Jitendra Yadav recorded the statement of prosecutrix in the presence of her mother. He, after getting the consent vide letter (Exhibit-P/2) of the complainant and his wife, sent prosecutrix to Community Heath Centre, Sanawad for her medical examination. On the same day, at about 7.45 PM, Dr. Hansa Patidar medically examined her and prepared MLC report (Exhibit-P/6) stating therein that her 28 tooth were erupted and her hymen was found ruptured. As her menstruation period was going on, she could not prepare her vaginal slides. She sealed her clothes and handed over the same to the concerned police constable. On 22.11.2014, when the prosecutrix was again brought to the Community Health Centre, she prepared her vaginal slides as per MLC report (Exhibit-P/7) and handed over the same to the concerned police constable.
(iii) S.I. Jitendra Yadav seized the vehicle Hero Honda motorcycle bearing registration No.MP12 MG 4384 involved in the alleged crime from the possession of the appellant as per seizure memo (Exhibit- P/12), arrested appellant as per arrest memo (Exhibit-P/13) and sent him to the Community Health Centre, Sanawad for his medical examination, where on 18.11.2014, at about 9.20 PM, Dr. Mubarak Syed medically examined and found him capable of doing sexual acts as per MLC report (Exhibit-P/14) and prepared his semen slides as per MLC report (Exhibit-P/15). S. I. Jitendra Yadav obtained scholar register entry (Exhibit-P/8) and also letter/certificate (Exhibit-P/9) from the Principal, Government Se
School records' date of birth entries admissible but not conclusive proof of age without evidence of basis; prosecution must prove victim's minority beyond reasonable doubt for statutory rape convict....
The prosecution must provide conclusive evidence of a victim's age and lack of consent in sexual assault cases; insufficient evidence leads to acquittal.
Prosecution must prove the age of the victim to secure conviction under relevant IPC sections; evidentiary discrepancies can lead to acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.