SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 61

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Jitendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Bharat Yadav for appellant;
Rajesh Joshi, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

JUDGEMENT

1. The appellant has preferred this appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) [in short “Cr.P.C.”] against the judgement dated 24.8.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Badwah, District Khargone (M.P.) in S.T. No.13/2015, whereby the appellant has been convicted under sections 363, 366 and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code (in short “IPC”) alongwith section 3/4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short “POCSO Act”) and sentenced him to undergo RI for 2 years with fine of Rs.1,000/-, RI for 3 years with fine of Rs.1,000/-, RI for 10 years with fine of Rs.2,000/- and RI for 7 years with fine of Rs.2,000/ and in default of payment of fine, to undergo additional RI for 1 month, 1 month, 2 months and 2 months respectively.

2. Prosecution story, in brief is as follows :-

(i) On 11.11.2014, at about 16.00 hours, when complainant’s minor daughter prosecutrix, aged about 14 years was alone in her house situated at Indira Nagar Bedi, Sanawad, District Khargone, appellant came there and on the false pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top