SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2300

G. A. SANAP
Kaushik Keshavlal Lakhani – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.V.Manohar, Advocate, Akshay Naik, Advocate, Y.N.Sambre, Advocate, Amit Chutke, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Heard.

2. In this criminal application, filed under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the applicants (original accused) have prayed for quashing and setting aside the order issuing summons dtd. 13/11/2013 in Regular Criminal Case No. 4376 of 2013 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur and also for quashing and setting aside the complaint bearing Regular Criminal Case No. 4376 of 2013.

3. Background facts: The complaint in question was filed by respondent No.1 against the applicants for contravention of the provisions of Sec. 26(1) read with Sec. 26 (2)(i) read with Sec. 27(1) of the Foods, Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (For short 'the FSS Act 2006') and read with Sec. 3(1)(zz) (vii) read with Regulation 3.1.2 (7) of the Food Products (Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011 (For short 'the Regulation of 2011). It is the case of the respondent No.1 in the complaint, that on 17/11/2012 at about 11:00 a.m. alongwith independent witnesses he visited the premises of M/s. V. K. Agencies owned by applicant No.1. On inspection of the premises he discovered about 200 wholesale packs of lozenges of 584.2 grams each. Responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top