SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1987

U. J. PHALKE
Nitin – Appellant
Versus
Saiyyad Musharraf – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.S.Deshpande, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Present appeal is preferred by the appellant challenging the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Washim for dismissing the complaint as the complainant was absent in Summary Criminal Case No. 24/2016 dtd. 02/07/2019. The appeal is dismissed by observing that though summons has been issued to the complainant, and on the day of appointed on the appearance of the accused, or any day subsequent thereto which the hearing is adjourned. The complainant does not appear and dismissed the complaint.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The respondent served but failed to appear before this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that present appellant has filed complaint under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable instruments Act against the respondent/ accused on the submissions that respondent is a proprietor of Siddhiki Tours and Travels. The complainant and the accused being friends known each other since long and out of the trust, the amount of Rs.10, 00, 000.00 was paid to the respondent. The complainant has paid Rs.7, 00, 000.00 by online transaction and Rs.3, 00, 000.00 is paid to the accused in cash. On demand, the accused issued a cheque be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top