Back
G. S. PATEL, KAMAL KHATA
Rational Art And Press Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property zoning classification (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments against zoning classification (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. counterarguments on zoning and public participation (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. development and changes in zoning applications (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. objections based on regulations and constitutionality (Para 21 , 22) |
| 6. definitions and provisions of mrtp act (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. sanctioning process of development plan (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. state government's discretion in sanctioning (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 9. dcpr regulations and zoning requirements (Para 50 , 52 , 53) |
| 10. arguments on premium and land ceding conditions (Para 58 , 66) |
| 11. the discretion of planning authorities in zoning decisions is broad and not easily subject to judicial review. (Para 62) |
| 12. conclusion and order (Para 68) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
G.S.PATEL, J. - Rule.
2. Respondents waive service. A few days ago, we heard Dr Tulzapurkar for the Petitioner and Dr Saraf, learned Advocate General for the State Government extensively and listed the matter for orders.
3. Just south of the Ravindra Natya Mandir and Siddhivinayak Temple lies Appasaheb Marathe Marg. There is here, in the M
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
