SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2175

U. J. PHALKE
Pratibharaje – Appellant
Versus
Charulata – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.Manohar, Advocate, N.A.Gaikwad, Advocate, A.G.Paunikar, Advocate, D.Chatterjee, Advocate, B.Lahiri, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Heard learned Counsels appearing for the parties.

2. The appellant has challenged the judgment and award dtd. 30/4/2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur ("Tribunal", for short) in Claim Petition No.1081 of 1999, by which awarded the compensation of Rs.7, 72, 500.00 alongwith interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of application till its realization. The claimant preferred this appeal for enhancement of compensation.

3. The brief facts, which are necessary for the disposal of the appeal, are as under : Deceased Rishiraj Pratapkumar Mane on 8/12/1998 alongwith other four was proceeding in his Maruti Car MH-31- Z-2291 from Khapari to Mahal Nagpur. At the relevant time, one Prashant Dhote was driving the Maruti Car. As per the contention of the claimant, the Maruti Car driver was driving the said car by left side of the road by observing traffic rules and regulations. At about 3:45 a.m., said Maruti Car reached at Chinchbhawan locality at Wardha Road. At the relevant time, one Matador bearing No.MWY-5886 driven by its driver came from opposite direction in excessive speed and dashed against the Maruti Car. Due to the severe dash, said Ri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top