NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Nabhabai Gorakh Gaikwad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
1. Heard.
2. Admit. Taken up for final hearing with the consent of parties.
3. This appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, challenges judgment and award dated 28.11.2016 passed by learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhule, in M.A.C.P. No. 543 of 2012.
4. Facts leading to this first appeal, in brief, can be stated thus:
5. Opponent Nos. 1 and 2/Driver and owner of offending vehicle did not appear in the Tri
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram and Others (2018) 18 SCC 130
Dheeraj Singh vs. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & Ors. AIR 2023 SC 3110
Nagappa v. Gurudayal Singh and Others
National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi
Ningamma and Anr. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. AIR 2009 SC 3056
Ramla and Ors. vs. National Insurance Company Limited and Ors. (2019) 2 SCC 192
The appellate court can enhance compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act even without a cross-appeal from claimants, ensuring just compensation based on evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's duty to award just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, taking into account recent legal developments and the power of the Court ....
In appeals concerning compensation claims, parties seeking enhancement must file cross-objections; failure to do so limits the appellate court's scope for adjustment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.