JITENDRA JAIN
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Amit Surendra Mittal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jitendra Jain, J. - The present appeal is fled by the State of Maharashtra (original complainant) under section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the order dated 3rd February 2006 passed by the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 39th Court, Vile Parle, Mumbai acquitting Respondent (original accused) of the offence under section 53(1) of The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 ('MRTP Act').
2. Narrative of Events:
(ii) On 10th June 2002, a notice under section 53(1) of the MRTP Act was issued by Shri. Sawant to the Respondent accused directing him to discontinue the use of garage as beauty parlour within one month from the date of notice. The said notice further stated that failure to comply with the same would result into prosecution.
(iii) On 22nd July 2002, a second inspection report was submitted by Shri. Uttam Mulik, offcer of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ('MCGM') in whi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.