Shailesh Mulchand Savla Sole Proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders And Developers vs Chief Executive Officer , Slum Rehabilitation Authority

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Bom) 574

SANDEEP V. MARNE
Shailesh Mulchand Savla Sole Proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders And Developers – Appellant
Versus
Chief Executive Officer , Slum Rehabilitation Authority – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Shashikant Surana i/b Mr. Madhur R. Sharma for the Petitioner; Mr. D.J. Khambata, Senior Advocate and Mr. S.U. Kamdar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Swapnil Bangur, Mr. Abhishek Adke and Mr. Sagar Vichare for Respondent No.2. Mr. Nikhil Sakhardande, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Charalwar i/b Ms. Reena M. Panchal for Respondent No.4. Mr. Kunal V. Phoole for Respondent No.3. Mr. Vijay D. Patil for Respondent No.1/SRA. Mr. Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy) with Mr. Abhijit Patil and Ms. Ashwini Jadhav for Respondent No.5-AGRC.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the slum rehabilitation scheme (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13)
2. arguments by the petitioner regarding termination (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
3. respondents' counterarguments about petitioner's actions (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
4. court's reasoning on authority under the slum act (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
5. legal interpretations affirm the authority’s right to terminate service. (Para 36 , 37)
6. final ruling and dismissal of the petition (Para 44 , 45 , 55 , 56)

JUDGMENT

Sandeep V. Marne, J. - Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for parties, the Petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

The Challenge

2. By this Petition, Petitioner challenges order dated 25 November 2020 passed by Chief Executive Officer of Slum Rehabilitation Authority under provisions of section 13 (2) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 (the Slum Act) terminating his appointment to execute the subject Slum Rehabilitation Scheme and granting liberty to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3-Societies to appoint new Developer of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Bom) 574

SANDEEP V. MARNEShailesh Mulchand Savla Sole Proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders And Developers – AppellantVersusChief Executive Officer , Slum Rehabilitation Authority – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

SANDEEP V. MARNE
Shailesh Mulchand Savla Sole Proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders And Developers – Appellant
Versus
Chief Executive Officer , Slum Rehabilitation Authority – Respondent