Back
MILIND N. JADHAV
Dhanraj Tejmal Lukad – Appellant
Versus
Apex Grievance Redressal Committee – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Milind N. Jadhav, J. - The present Writ Petitions assail separate orders both dated 20.04.2023 passed by Respondent No.1 - Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (for short 'AGRC'). By virtue of the said orders, the common order dated 30.12.2022 passed by the Tahsildar - 2 (Western Suburban) Slum Rehabilitation Authority (for short 'SRA') under Sections 33 and 38 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Regulation) Act, 1971 (for short 'the said Act') is upheld and further consequential directions are given for execution of Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement (for short 'PAAA'). The orders are identical. Facts are also identical. The order dated 30.12.2022 is at Exhibit 'E' - page No.37 of Writ Petition No.14111 of 2023. By this order, Writ Petitioners are directed to vacate their structure immediately and hand over the same to Respondent No.3 -Developer with further consequential direction that structures of dissenting members should be demolished by the Competent Authority if they do not cooperate and vacate their structures. After passing of the above orders, both Petitioners agreed to vacate their structures. Further orders regarding vacating the st
The principle of estoppel applies in cases where a party relies on a promise or representation made by another party, particularly in the context of rehabilitation and eviction under slum development....
(1) Revision Petition can be re-instated if it has been withdrawn in exchange of an offer of settlement.(2) Mere possession on paper does not translate into actual possession.(3) A court-mandated all....
The developers' readiness and willingness to allot permanent alternate accommodation and the restriction of liability for transit rent till the date of issuance of the part Occupancy Certificate were....
As per Scheme 2016, the petitioners are required to be alloted residential unit in a newly constructed housing society on the basis of public draw.
Executing court cannot revisit decree executability on identification grounds adjudicated earlier; must enforce as stands, applying restitution for demolished possession via reconstruction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
