Back
BHARATI DANGRE, MANJUSHA DESHPANDE
Pooja Gagan Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident leading to legal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution's response to public outcry. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. bail considerations under juvenile justice. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. procedural fairness and rehabilitation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. rights of the child in conflict with law. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. legal arguments around jurisdiction of the board concerning juvenile detention. (Para 16 , 34 , 36) |
| 7. rehabilitation processes under the act. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. statutory interpretation of juvenile justice. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. bail and custody provisions under law. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. legality of detaining a child already on bail. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 11. enforcement of law regardless of public sentiment. (Para 39 , 40) |
| 12. final directive for release and ongoing rehabilitation. (Para 41) |
JUDGMENT
Bharati Dangre, J. - In the early hours of 19.05.2024 a ghastly incident killed two young individuals in the city of Pune and the cause for the same happened to be Porsche car rashly driven by Master X, a child in conflict with law (hereinafter referred to as 'CCL').
It is subsequently revealed during the investigation that the CCL was driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
