SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 72

ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Jitendra S/o Badrinaryan Toshniwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Milind M Joshi
For the Respondent: Mr. N.D. Batule

JUDGMENT :

ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

1. Conviction recorded for offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the learned First Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Session Case No.246 of 2002, dated 07.01.2004 is hereby assailed by the appellant by filing instant appeal.

2. Informant PW-5 initially worked as an Agent in a credit society along with one Bharti. There used to be quarrel between both ladies. Informant was also required to quit job. On 18.01.2001, Dayanand Toshniwal brother of Bharti developed contact and issued threats if she troubles his sister Bharti. On 27.01.2001, informant received offer to work as Editor. On 14.04.2001, she received phone call from Sushant Patil and she was called in hotel at Akola with certificates and photographs and, then, she was told that they have to go to Nagpur to attend conference. In the said hotel she met with Sushant Patil, who was accompanied by one Rane. Sushant Patil also told informant that they have to go to Nagpur in the same night, however, they could not go.

On 18.04.2001, informant received phone call from Sushant Patil and she was again called at Akola in a hotel. There again she saw accused Rane with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top