SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
The Indian Express (P) Ltd. & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Ganesh Gopinath Rane - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 8387 of 2024
Decided On : 02-07-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud a/w. Mr. Amol Joshi, Mr. Pranit Kulkarni, Ms. Tejasvi Ghag i/by. Ms. Poorvi Kamani.
For the Respondent: Ms. Jane Cox, i/by. Mr. Ghanshyam R. Thombare.

Transfer is a standard condition of service, and can only be challenged on grounds of mala fides, which require substantial proof of personal bias or improper motive.

Headnote:(A) Relevant laws - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Transfer as condition of service - The court clarified that transferability is an essential term of service and ordinary transfers cannot be interfered with unless proven mala fide or in violation of statutory guidelines. (Paras 27, 21, 22)

(B) Promotion and Transfer - The court emphasized that a transfer coupled with promotion must demonstrate necessity and is generally not malafide unless specific evidence is provided. Interfering requires substantial proof of personal bias. (Paras 18, 31)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners contested an interim order from the Industrial Court restraining them from implementing a recent promotion and transfer of the respondent, who alleged systemic harassment linked to union activities and prior transfers. (Paras 5, 10)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the transfer was part of normal service conditions and upheld the need for the respondent's relocation in light of administrative exigencies. (Paras 31, 24)

Issues: The main questions included whether the transfer was justified given the respondent's previous complaints of malafide actions against him and if the promotion was a genuine exercise of management discretion. (Paras 8, 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that without sufficient evidence proving malice, the employer's discretion in transfer and promotion stands, considering transfer is often essential in employment contracts. (Paras 12, 20)

Result: Writ petition allowed; the appeal to retain the respondent in his previous location until January 2025 was granted, after which he must comply with the transfer order. (Paras 32, 33)

Table of Content
1. interim orders in employment disputes are subject to judicial review. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background of employment and complaints (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. arguments on the legitimacy of transfer (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11)
4. court's consideration of employment terms (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. legal doctrine on mala fides in transfers (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. court's view on existing allegations of bias (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
7. final decision on transfer and position of employee (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
8. conclusion on the petition's outcome (Para 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep V. Marne, J.

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is taken for final hearing and disposal.

2. Interim order passed by the Industrial Court, Thane on Application at Exh.U-2 temporarily restraining Petitioner No.1 to give effect to the promotion/transfer order issued in respect of the Respondent is the subject matter of challenge in the present petition.

3. Petitioner No. 1 is engaged in the business inter alia of printing and publishing newspapers and other publications and has multiple printing presses across the country. Respondent joined services of the first Petitioner as Trainee Semi-Skilled Baller in the Rotary Department of the first Petitioner vide appointment letter dated 25 March 2002. Subsequently, Respondent was put on probation as Semi-Skilled Baller in the Rotary Department by order dated 27 March 2003. After his performance being found satisfactory, he was made permanent by letter dated 11 July 2003. He was re-designated as Senior Semi-Skilled Baller by letter dated 22 March 2004 with effect from 1 July 2003. Respondent was promoted to the post of Machineman on 29 December 2008 and Assistant Printer on 16 August 2012. As per the recommendation of the Majithia Wage Board, he was redesignated as Senior Printer with effect from 1 July 2019. Respondent is posted as Senior Printer at the printing press of the first Petitioner at Mahape, Navi Mumbai. Respondent and other employees apprehended adverse action of termination and transfer against them in the light of conduct of Union elections in August 2022 and filed Complaint (ULP) No.160 of 2022 seeking stay on proposed termination/transfer. On 19 September 2022, an interim order was passed by Industrial Court, Thane in the said complaint restraining Petitioners from terminating the services of Respondents therein without following due process of law and from implementing transfer orders, if issued, for 7 days. That interim order was challenged by the first Petitioner by filing Writ Petition No.10814 of 2023.

4. On 7 November 2022, an order was issued deputing the services of Respondent to Lucknow. Respondent filed Complaint (ULP) No.219 of 2022 challenging the deputation order dated 7 November 2022. The Industrial Court, Thane passed order dated 28 November 2022 granting interim relief of stay on the deputation order dated 7 November 2022. Petitioners filed Writ Petition No.2438 of 2023 challenging the interim order of the Industrial Court, Thane dated 28 November 2022. The Writ Petition was allowed by this Court by Judgment and Order dated 5 June 2023 setting aside the interim order of the Industrial Court. This Court however, accepted undertaking from the first Petitioner that the period of deputation shall not exceed six months and that Respondent would be re-posted at Mahape printing press at the end of deputation period of six months. Respondent completed the period of his deputation at Lucknow and was re-posted at Mahape Printing Press in December-2023. In the meantime, this Court allowed Writ Petition No. 10814 of 2023 set aside interim order dated 19 September 2022 passed by the Industrial Court giving blanket stay on termination and transfer by order dated 30 January 2024.

5. First Petitioner issued order dated 10 April 2024 promoting Respondent from the post of Senior Printer t

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top