SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
G.A. SANAP, J.
Shrikant, s/o Premlal Kukwas - Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Police Station Wathoda, Nagpur and Anr. - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 174 Of 2021
Decided On : 10-07-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr Naman Bhangde, Adv. h/f Mr. A.K. Bhangde, Adv.
For the Respondents: Ms Mukta Kavimandan, APP, Ms Radha Mishra, Adv.

The court held that consistent testimony from the victim and medical evidence established the accused's guilt in a sexual assault case under the POCSO Act and IPC.

Headnote:(A) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 4 - Indian Penal Code - Section 377 - Conviction of the accused under POCSO and IPC for sexual assault against a minor - Sentences of seven years and five years simple imprisonment imposed respectively - Evidence of the victim, corroborated by medical examination, was consistent and reliable - Defence of false implication not established. (Paras 1, 10, 20)

(B) The principle of corroboration in sexual offence cases - The testimony of the victim, coupled with medical evidence and conduct of the informant, established the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 10, 20)

Facts of the case:
The accused was charged with sexual assault against a 12-year-old boy, whom he lured to his house and subsequently assaulted. Reports were lodged by the victim's mother after noticing unusual behavior and injuries. (Paras 2, 3, 10)

Findings of Court:
The medical examination confirmed injuries consistent with sexual assault. The victim's evidence was coherent and supported by the mother's timely actions to secure medical care, ruling out any significant delay in reporting. (Paras 10, 20)

Issues: Whether the evidence of the victim and the informant was sufficient to establish the crime and whether any false implication by the accused could be reasonably inferred. (Paras 5, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that the evidence from the victim and medical corroborations was compelling enough to uphold the conviction, while the defence's claims of false implication lacked substantiation. (Paras 20, 21)

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. conviction under pocso and ipc established. (Para 1)
2. victim's medical examination and initial report (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. prosecution's burden of proof and witness reliability (Para 5 , 10 , 11)
4. defense argument and appeal details (Para 7 , 8)
5. assessment of evidence and credibility affirmed. (Para 9)
6. credibility of victim's statements and cross-examination (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
7. medical evidence corroborates victim's testimony (Para 16 , 17 , 19)
8. final decision on appeal regarding evidence (Para 20 , 21)
9. conclusion on dismissal of appeal (Para 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT :

G.A. Sanap, J.

1. In this appeal, the challenge is to the judgment and order dated 09.02.2021 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge-9, Nagpur, whereby the learned Sessions Judge, on conviction, sentenced the accused under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “ POCSO ”) to undergo simple imprisonment of seven years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment of three months and sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment of five years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment of three months for the offence punishable under Section 377 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short “ I.P.C.”).

2. Background facts:-

The victim boy, on the date of the incident, was 12 years old. The report was lodged by his mother, PW-1. It is the case of the prosecution that at the time of occurrence of incident, the victim was residing with his mother and other family members. The accused is residing in front of the house of the informant. On 17.11.2019 at about 12.00 p.m. the accused called the victim to his house. The victim went to the house of the accused. The victim returned at 2.00 p.m. The mother of the victim noticed that the victim was crying. On inquiry with the victim, he informed that the accused in his house removed his pant and also his own pant and thereafter inserted his penis into his anus. The mother of the victim on examination, found the injuries at the anus of the victim. The victim complained of pain in his anus. The mother of the victim immediately took the victim to the dispensary in the locality. From the dispensary in the locality she took the victim to the Radiance Hospital.

3. In the Radiance Hospital, the victim was examined by Dr. Krishna Beniram Gopche (PW-4) and Dr. Manoj Gukul Purohit (PW-5). PW-4, after noting down the history of assault found that it was a medico legal case and therefore, he informed the police. In the night of 17.11.2019 Police Station Officer and WPC Seema visited Radiance Hospital, Nagpur. They recorded the statement of the victim. The mother of the victim thereafter went to Police Station and lodged a report of the incident. On the basis of this report, crime bearing No.53/2019 was registered against the accused at Wathoda Police Station.

4. After registration of the crime, Police Station Officer went to the scene of the occurrence and drew spot panchanama on 18.11.2019. He seized the articles from the spot. PSI Ambhore conducted further investigations. The victim boy was referred for medical examination on 18.11.2019. The accused was arrested on 18.11.2019. The clothes of the victim and the clothes of the accused were seized. Investigating Officer recorded the statements of the witnesses. The samples were sent for chemical analysis. On completion of the investigation, the charge-sheet was filed against the accused.

5. Learned Sessions Judge framed the charge against the accused. The accused pleaded not guilty to the charge. The defence of the accused is of false implication on account of enmity between him and the family of the victim. The prosecution, in order to bring home guilt against the accused, examined ten witnesses. Learned Judge on consideration of the evidence found the accused guilty of the offence punishable under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top