Back
NITIN W. SAMBRE, ABHAY J. MANTRI
Kalpana Dnyaneshwar Ingle – Appellant
Versus
Schedule Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to scrutiny committee's order regarding caste claim. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. legal arguments regarding validity certificates of relatives. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's affirmation of petitioner's entitlement. (Para 12) |
| 4. court's final order setting aside the scrutiny committee's decision. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of learned counsel for the parties.
2. The challenge in the petition is to the order dated 27/02/2024 passed by the respondent No. 1-Scrutiny Committee invalidating the claim of the petitioner of belonging to ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe.
3. The petitioner secured a caste-certificate dated 27/12/2004 from the office of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Washim certifying that the petitioner belongs to ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe. Subsequently based on said certificate the petitioner availed the opportunity of getting public employment.
4. As a sequel of above, the petitioner was granted appointment on a post which was reserved for Scheduled Tribe category. However, such appointment was subject to submission of validity certificate.
5. In support of the tribe-claim, t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
