SANDEEP V. MARNE
Abhay Dushyant Desai – Appellant
Versus
K. C. Chheda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1. Revisionary jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) is invoked challenging the judgment and order dated 24 April 2023 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court, Mumbai, dismissing Appeal No. 03 of 2013 filed by the Applicant and confirming the Judgment and Order dated 22 November 2012 passed by the learned Judge of the Small Causes Court at Mumbai in R.A.E. & R. Suit No. 436/816 of 2004. The learned Judge of the Small Causes Court has decreed the Suit filed by Plaintiff /Respondent and has directed the Applicant/Defendant to handover possession of the suit premises to the Plaintiff on the ground that Defendant was in arrears of rent and permitted increases.
2. Facts of the case, as pleaded by the Plaintiff in the Plaint, are that Flat No. 18 situated on 5th floor of the building Mayfair, at 75-C, Veer Nariman Road, Mumbai 400 020 is the suit premises. Plaintiff claims to be the owner and landlord of the property known as ‘Mayfair Building.’ Original Defendant-Dushyant Nanubhai Desai was the Karta and Manager of D.N. Desai and others (HUF). The said HUF was inducted as tenant in respect of th
Khadi Gram Udyog Trust Vs. Ram Chandraji Virajman Mandir Sarasiya Ghat, Kanpur
A tenant must deposit all arrears of rent, including time-barred amounts, to claim protection from eviction under Section 15(3) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act.
Timely application and deposit of rent, even if slightly delayed due to holidays, fulfill statutory requirements preventing eviction under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act.
A tenant's failure to communicate rent deposits and respond to rent demands constitutes default, justifying eviction under the Bombay Rent Act.
Tenant must comply with statutory deposit requirements under Section 12(3) of the Bombay Rent Act, including interest and costs, to avoid eviction.
A tenant in default for over six months without disputing the rent is subject to eviction under Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rent Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of the provisions of Section 12(3) of the Rent Act, requiring the tenant to deposit the whole rent and comply with the timing ....
A landlord must issue a valid demand notice under Section 15(2) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act before initiating eviction proceedings; failure to do so renders the suit invalid.
The tenant's failure to pay rent and timely file for standard rent fixation leads to eviction under the Bombay Rent Act, despite claims of payment to co-owners.
A valid demand notice under Section 15(2) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act must specify the amount due and be addressed to the tenant; failure to do so invalidates eviction proceedings.
A valid demand notice under Section 15(2) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act is essential before eviction on grounds of rent default; failure to comply renders the suit non-maintainable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.