SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 1024

G. A. SANAP
Satish – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sumesha Choudhari, Adv.
For the Respondent: Neerja Chaubey, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

(G.A. Sanap, J.)

1. ADMIT. Heard finally with the consent of learned advocates for the parties.

2. In this appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (for short, "the Act of 1987"), challenge is to the judgment and order dated 30th August, 2023, passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, whereby the claim filed by the appellant came to be dismissed.

3. BACKGROUND FACTS:

The appellant is the injured in this case. It is stated that on 21st September, 2018, he came to Pathrad Railway Station to go to Nanded. At the railway station, he purchased the journey ticket. After arrival of the Nizamabad-Nanded Passenger Train, the appellant, along with his friend Suraj Yedke, boarded the train. There was a heavy rush in the train. It is stated that while entering the train, there was a jerk to the train, and as a result thereof, he fell down and sustained the injury. His friend Suraj pulled the chain, and, therefore, the train was stopped. He sustained the injury to his right leg. His leg was crushed under the wheels of the train. He was carried by the same train to Nanded. The ticket was handed over by him to the police. It is stated that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top