B. P. COLABAWALLA, SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
Navin Popatlal Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.)
1. Rule. By consent of parties, rule is made returnable forthwith, and the Writ Petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.
2. Whether the State Government has any right to impose a minimum price condition under Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 ("MLRC") when approving acquisition of land by a non-tribal from a tribal, is the prime question we have been presented with, when adjudicating this Writ Petition. We hold in the affirmative.
3. As an alternative, we have been petitioned to declare that the State Government must have regard to the value of the land as of the date of the application under Section 36A and not at the time of the approval. The law on this issue is well settled-the value must bear reference to the time of a valid application complete in all respects. However, in the facts of this case, the value of the land in 2012 has been rendered irrelevant because the Petitioners' proposal to acquire tribal land was rejected in 2021.
The Parties:
4. The Petitioners, Mr. Navin Popatlal Shah and Mr. Nitin Sundraji Shah (for short, "the Shahs"), have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of In
B. Premanand & Others vs. Mohan Koikal & Others – 2011 (4) SCC 266
The court affirmed the State's authority to impose a minimum price condition for tribal land transfers under Section 36A of the MLRC, emphasizing the need for current market value to protect tribal i....
Civil Law - Land - Sanction of Collector under Section 36A for transfer - Permission/sanction letter - Tribal lands to Non-tribals lands - It is true that Rule 4 of said Rules provides that Collector....
(1) There is no bar for a tribal to enter into an agreement to sell and seeking advance sale consideration.(2) If a property is not transferable without permission of authority, an agreement to trans....
The court upheld the Arbitrator's award on property transactions, emphasizing the necessity of permissions under applicable land laws while affirming that a plausible ruling can stand even with insuf....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the purchase cannot be deemed ineffective unless the Tribunal fails to recover the purchase price from the tenant as arrears of land revenue, ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.